Adventures In Audio

The problem with parallel compression that you didn't know you had. What it sounds like and how to fix it.

If you're parallel compressing, and you should be because it's such a useful effect, then you have a problem that you need to consider. If you don't then your mix won't turn out the way you expect it to.

I've written two articles on parallel compression recently - How to automate tracks that have parallel compression and What does parallel compression on vocals sound like?

The first describes the problem I'm talking about, and the second demonstrates parallel compression with audio clips.

But I haven't actually demonstrated the problem yet, so I'll do that in a moment. But first a recap of the problem.

Let's suppose that you parallel compress like this (click the image for a larger view)...

Parallel compression with automation

This is one of the standard ways of parallel compressing. Another is to duplicate the track rather than using an aux but that method is not problem-free either and I'll cover it on another day.

What we can see is that there's a vocal on one track. That track is bussed to an aux track which is compressed and blended in with the vocal. The result is parallel compression that brings up the lower levels while leaving higher levels mostly unchanged. It sounds nice.

The problem briefly is that if you want to change the level of the vocal, then the parallel compressed version will sound different as well as being different in level. This is because you've changed the proportions of uncompressed and compressed signal. This applies whether you use a post-fade or pre-fade send.

If you don't realize this, then you're not in full control of your mix, and that's important.

If on the other hand you are aware of what's happening, you can make whatever adjustments that are necessary, or make an informed judgment to leave things as they are.

So what's at stake here?

Well, I have two examples. In one I have an audio clip made with the settings shown in the screenshot above. In the other, I have lowered the level of the track named Vocal by 10 dB, with a post-fade aux send. I have then corrected the levels so that both examples are at the same level, as measured by the Waves WLM Plus loudness meter. So here goes...

Vocal at 0 dB (Example 1)...

Vocal at -10 dB, level corrected (Example 2)...

Can you hear the difference?

If you can then either you have very sharp ears, or you are experienced in audio and you're attuned to such small changes, many small changes adding up to big differences over the course of a full mix.

But I can demonstrate more clearly...

In the next example I have put Example 1 in the left channel and Example 2 in the right. You should listen on headphones.

What you will hear is that the stereo image shifts according to the relative levels of the signals. The image shift correlates to differences between the two signals, demonstrating that the two examples are indeed different. So lowering the level of the vocal track has changed the sound of the parallel compression.

If you are just changing the fader level, then you can either ignore the difference, or compensate for it. But if you are automating the fader, then the sound of the parallel compression will change as the song plays through. Clearly this is a problem that needs to be resolved.

OK, so now you know about this potential issue, take a look at How to automate tracks that have parallel compression and you'll see one way of handling this.

Audio - Such fun!

Friday April 3, 2020

Like, follow, and comment on this article at Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Instagram or the social network of your choice.

David Mellor

David Mellor

David Mellor is CEO and Course Director of Audio Masterclass. David has designed courses in audio education and training since 1986 and is the publisher and principal writer of Adventures In Audio.

Learn Pro Tools with our amazing range of video courses

Pro Tools video course catalog

Browse Pro Tools courses...

Learn Logic Pro with our amazing range of video courses

Logic Pro video course catalog

Browse Logic Pro courses...

Learn Cubase with our amazing range of video courses

Cubase video course catalog

Browse Cubase courses...

Audio Masterclass gives you all the technical knowledge and skills to bring your musical dreams to life

The Audio Masterclass Music Production and Sound Engineering Course

Get the most from your studio with the Audio Masterclass Music Production and Sound Engineering Course.

Learn more...

More from Adventures In Audio...

Your power amp is average - Here's why

Adding tube warmth with the Freqtube FT-1 - Audio demonstration

Adding tubes to a synth track with Freqport Freqtube

The tiny amp that does (nearly) everything

Can I unmix this track?

Why you need a mono amp in your system - Fosi Audio ZA3 review

Can you get great earbud bass with Soundpeats AIR4 Pro?

24 bits or 96 kHz? Which makes most difference?

16-bit vs. 24-bit - Less noise or more detail?

Are these earphones REALLY lossless? Questyle NHB12

Could this be your first oscilloscope? FNIRSI DSO-TC3

OneOdio Monitor 60 Hi-Res wired headphones full review

Watch me rebuild my studio with the FlexiSpot E7 Pro standing desk

Can a tiny box do all this? Testing the Fosi Audio SK01 headphone amp, preamp, EQ

Hi-Fi comfort OVER your ears? TRUEFREE O1 detailed review

Get the tube sound in your system with the Fosi Audio P3

Any studio you like, any listening room you like - For producers and audiophiles

Hidden Hi-Fi - The equipment you never knew you *didn't* need - Fosi Audio N3

Adding tubes to a jazz mix with Freqport Freqtube

Adding tubes to a rock master with Freqport Freqtube

Adding tubes to female vocals with Freqport Freqtube

Adding tubes to male vocals with Freqport Freqtube

Adding tubes to real drums with Freqport Freqtube

Adding tubes to a bass guitar with Freqport Freqtube