Adventures In Audio

Mixing: What is the 'Pedalboard Exception'?

Should you send your mix engineer raw WAVs or crafted and polished stems? Your answer to this question will make your mix engineer either love you or hate you.

The Pedalboard Exception: A metaphor for a sound created by a producer that should not be altered by the mix engineer in any way.

Firstly, what do I mean by raw WAV in this context?

I mean one track of your multitrack recording bounced to a WAV file without any insert or bus processing or effects. So imagine during your recording process you had applied EQ, compression and reverb to the lead vocal, to give it a context for the other instruments and background vocals. For your raw WAV you would disable your insert plug-ins and mute the reverb track.

The reason you would do this is that you want to give your mix engineer as much flexibility as possible. There's an expression 'Why keep a dog and bark yourself?'

Following this reasoning, then no matter what processing and effects you have applied in your DAW session, you should switch them all off before printing WAVs to send to your mix engineer.

Congratulations, you've done it right and your mix engineer loves you! You have used insert and bus processes and effects to give you context during the recording process. But you realize that although you are the master of your own musical expression, the mix engineer is massively more experienced and skilled in gelling sounds together to make a great record.

But there is an exception...

The Pedalboard Exception

If there's a good reason why you should disable your inserts and bus processes and effects before exporting WAVs, then you might also consider why this would not apply to your guitarist's pedalboard effects.

Well yes, there's the very good reason that you've already recorded them and you can't switch them off. But the question is more a case of "Why would you not want to?"

The answer is that the pedalboard is part of the guitarist's sound, as is their amplifier and loudspeaker cabinet, or their own personal amp emulator. Other than technique, guitarists spend all their time working on their tone. TONE is a big word among guitarists, and rightly so.

So the sound that comes out of their loudspeaker cabinet, or their personal amp emulator, is their sound. And as a recording or mix engineer you would absolutely not want to deny them that.

So is this the Pedalboard Exception? Not quite...

If a guitarist strives to develop their own individual and unique tone, then perhaps as a producer so should you.

So you might for instance develop your own signature vocal sound - I'm going to say 'sound' from now on because 'tone' is a word that I feel should belong to guitarists rather than engineers and producers.

So your signature vocal sound might require a particular mic, a certain shape to the EQ, a particular compressor and ratio, a John Lennon-style delay, and perhaps a reverb preset that you have carefully crafted yourself, the parameters of which you keep tightly under lock and key.

Are you going to switch all of this off to send to your mix engineer? No way. NO WAY!

This is an example of the Pedalboard Exception. It's a metaphor for a sound that is exactly as you want it to be, and you don't want the mix engineer to alter it in any way.

Under the terms of the Pedalboard Exception you would not export a raw WAV of the track; you would export a stem.

What's a stem?

Trying to keep this brief - From the film industry: dialogue, sound effects, music. They are the three principal stems. All of the dialogue is mixed into one stem; all of the sound effects are mixed into another stem; all of the music is mixed into a third stem. Then the stems themselves can be mixed. It's a time-tested working procedure. There's more info here...

In music recording, stems are generally groups of instruments or vocals that can be balanced easily among themselves, like a drum set, or background vocals, or anything else that works nicely as a little sub-band in the mix.

So if you're mixing yourself, you could premix the drums, premix the background vocals, and perhaps premix rhythm acoustic and electric guitars. Then you can deactivate the original tracks and have a very much simpler mix screen to work with. It can make a lot of sense.

So you might think of doing this to send your song to your mix engineer. Send him or her stems of the drums etc. and individual tracks of everything else. (You're limiting the range of options that the mix engineer has, and hopefully you realize this and have a good reason for doing it.)

Or you can take this to its (il)logical conclusion and regard each track as a stem. So you export each track individually with all of its insert and bus effects and processes intact. This is why your mix engineer hates you. Their flexibility is now reduced to faders and pans, and possibly applying yet more effects.

Invoking the Pedalboard Exception

In view of the above, we can see that it would not be productive to export each individual track as a stem with processes and effects. But if you go to the other extreme and export all of your tracks as raw WAVs you can't show off your signature sounds.

So the solution is to think about that guitarist's pedalboard. If the sound you have achieved on any particular vocal or instrumental track is as significant as the guitarist's tone, then you need to export that track as a stem with processes and effects.

You have invoked the Pedalboard Exception.

But at the same time...

Give the mix engineer some wriggle room

It doesn't have to be either/or. If you really desperately want to export a track as a stem, but you're worried that the mix engineer won't like you cramping their creative style, you can export both.

Yes both - export that track both as a raw WAV and as a stem.

And since you will be giving your mix engineer some notes (and possibly your own rough mix), such as what's important and what's not, what kind of dynamics you want to hear etc., you can very clearly state that the raw WAV and the stem are alternatives. Your mix engineer may realize this almost instinctively, but they'll have to compare the two tracks all the way through to be sure. You can save them important time and brain compute cycles just by telling them what's what.

In summary

You'll win friends and influence mix engineers if you send them raw WAVs to mix. Sending too many tracks as stems-only hampers their creativity, which is what you're paying them for.

But if you have developed your own sound for a particular track, or couple of tracks, then export stems of those tracks as well as the raw WAVs. The mix engineer can either use your stems, or work with the raw WAVs and improve on them as they please.

The Pedalboard Exception - It's the best of both worlds!

Photo credit: Kit Rae.

Friday May 29, 2020

Like, follow, and comment on this article at Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Instagram or the social network of your choice.

David Mellor

David Mellor

David Mellor is CEO and Course Director of Audio Masterclass. David has designed courses in audio education and training since 1986 and is the publisher and principal writer of Adventures In Audio.

Learn Pro Tools with our amazing range of video courses

Pro Tools video course catalog

Browse Pro Tools courses...

Learn Logic Pro with our amazing range of video courses

Logic Pro video course catalog

Browse Logic Pro courses...

Learn Cubase with our amazing range of video courses

Cubase video course catalog

Browse Cubase courses...

Audio Masterclass gives you all the technical knowledge and skills to bring your musical dreams to life

The Audio Masterclass Music Production and Sound Engineering Course

Get the most from your studio with the Audio Masterclass Music Production and Sound Engineering Course.

Learn more...

More from Adventures In Audio...

A tiny amplifier with a weird switch in a strange place

Will this DAC/headphone-amp dongle work with *your* phone? [Fosi Audio DS2]

When is a tube power amp not a tube power amp? - Aiyima T9 review

I test the Verum 1 Planar Magnetic headphones for listening and production

Your power amp is average - Here's why

Adding tube warmth with the Freqtube FT-1 - Audio demonstration

Adding tubes to a synth track with Freqport Freqtube

The tiny amp that does (nearly) everything

Can I unmix this track?

Why you need a mono amp in your system - Fosi Audio ZA3 review

Can you get great earbud bass with Soundpeats AIR4 Pro?

24 bits or 96 kHz? Which makes most difference?

16-bit vs. 24-bit - Less noise or more detail?

Are these earphones REALLY lossless? Questyle NHB12

Could this be your first oscilloscope? FNIRSI DSO-TC3

OneOdio Monitor 60 Hi-Res wired headphones full review

Watch me rebuild my studio with the FlexiSpot E7 Pro standing desk

Can a tiny box do all this? Testing the Fosi Audio SK01 headphone amp, preamp, EQ

Hi-Fi comfort OVER your ears? TRUEFREE O1 detailed review

Get the tube sound in your system with the Fosi Audio P3

Any studio you like, any listening room you like - For producers and audiophiles

Hidden Hi-Fi - The equipment you never knew you *didn't* need - Fosi Audio N3

Adding tubes to a jazz mix with Freqport Freqtube

Adding tubes to a rock master with Freqport Freqtube