It's true - The Earth is flat!

@AudioMasterclass:  Haha, YouTube's AI context moderator is having a laugh I think. This video demonstrates that the Earth is genuinely flatter than an optical filter, if my math is correct. If you really do think that the Earth is flat, this video may not make you as happy as you think it will.

@Semper_Fish replies to @AudioMasterclass: The simple earth curve calculator is h=r*(1-cos a). Then it is upon the person to apply this in nature using the steps of the scientific method. This can be done at any large body of water at rest on a clear day looking at distant objects across the water and researching their distance from the observer to calculate the curve that should be obsructing the object. What will be observed is that there is no convexity of the water which lays flat and level and will never match the heliocentric required curve of h=r*(1-cos a), and you get to enjoy a nice day outside on the beach.

@Guy776 replies to @AudioMasterclass: The earth has to be flat can you think of anything shaped that’s not somewhat flat ,round just doesn’t make sense to me I’ve always just figured it was flat

@YodaDagobah replies to @AudioMasterclass: ​@@Guy776 yeah globetards all brainwashed by the lgbtq elites George Soros covi jabbers! Flat earth is science😆 no cap homie trump 2024

@YodaDagobah replies to @AudioMasterclass: If the earth was round then how do we not fall of the side of it huh🤔 keep eating what's been fed you sheep bahh bahhh bahhhh

@VinceMenger replies to @AudioMasterclass: @@Semper_Fish How dare you verify things for yourself... trust the "authorities" 😇. Oceans are level indeed, well, we call it sea level. The horizon is, well... horizontal too. A pleasure to read your valuable comment.

@marypound7531:  Ai is dumb

@Steven726:  Im lookin at the comments and it's very apparent that people can't handle the truth- so what they can't understand they mock

@Steven726:  Train lines are completely horizontal.
Explain planes which would have to be constantly dipping to keep up with the imaginary curvature, and if the earth is spinning at 1100mph, and moving 66,600mph (according to NASA) - well they're telling you that your senses are wrong, and that "we in the white coats know everything-so just shut up,keep your head down, don't ask any questions about the earth we live on- and just remain one of the Zombies who can't think for themselves"
People are programmed to mock the truth,mock the holy word of God, and they are kept in a little box and unable to think for themselves.
It's psychological damage to say you are moving 1000's of mph: is it any wonder there is an epidemic of mental illnesses in the world?

So just consider this for one second- if you're living in the UK, then there are people upside down in Australia, or are they vertical and you're upside-down?
Youll tell me "Gravity" which was supposedly made up by a magician and occultist called Isaac Newton.
When as a matter of fact objects that are heavier than air are going to fall, which is a case of density and buoyancy

Gimme a break! Think for yourselves people- or are you going let them control your mind?

@philbreadcrumbs8179 replies to @Steven726: Oh wow, you're very lost my friend. If you don't understand the basics of physics or even understand the difference in scale between a segment of train track and an entire planet then maybe you shouldn't me making silly comments like these ❤

@Steven726 replies to @Steven726: ​@philbreadcrumbs8179
The Lord rebuke those words!!
I am in Christ Jesus Christ, and I am found, not lost. You are either a liar, or you are under NASA's spell

@philbreadcrumbs8179 replies to @Steven726: ​@@Steven726 Oh wow, you've very clearly fallen far down the conspiracy rabbit hole. Take off that tinfoil hat and come join us here in reality.

Again, your lack of understanding regarding this topic is in no way a valid argument

@philbreadcrumbs8179 replies to @Steven726: ​@@Steven726 Stop whining about jesus and NASA otherwise nobody is going to take you seriously. If you have evidence that suggests I'm lying then I'd love to hear it

@danielcopeman1250:  RE READ your BIBLE... IT'S A FLAT EARTH BOOK!!!

@philbreadcrumbs8179 replies to @danielcopeman1250: No it's really not

@Burcin-sh8hk:  One LW radio tower is enough to broadcast all
over the world. Globe earthers claim signals reflect between ground and sky but this is wrong because ground absorbs signals. Einstein knew the measurements proved flat Earth so he claimed the light is bending according to curvature. They bended the truths however they wanted.

@pilot3016:  If earth was flat, airliners wouldn't fly the "great circle route" to Japan and waste fuel.

@rollingthunder4599:  It's easier to prove the earth is flat, than to prove it's a sphere

@eldergod4809 replies to @rollingthunder4599: Actually it's easier to fool a person by saying it's round than it is flat

@philbreadcrumbs8179 replies to @rollingthunder4599: Then why can none of you do it? 😂

@gnphoenix1:  Of course the earth is flat.👍
But if you're drunk it's a sphere on a tilt spinning in circles looping the sun🤪

@YouTubeAreCommunistScum:  Ur a d bag for this title

@AudioMasterclass replies to @YouTubeAreCommunistScum: If you would watch the video and try to understand it you'd find out who the d bag really is.

@highvibes3758:  we have to debate Professor Dave now about this!!!!

@DPrad-c4i:  If the Earth is flat Shouldn’t all the planets in the solar system Supposed to be flat

@AudioMasterclass replies to @DPrad-c4i: By the criterion in my video, at least some of them are.

@jimwohlfeil-watson7656 replies to @DPrad-c4i: They are wandering stars and looking thru a telescope that's not digital you'll see the look like they are floating in water

@Aug-v8g:  3:02

@bobica100:  All hail flat earthers

@johannjohann6523:  What's funny is when less than 1% of the population claim to be the only ones to know "The Truth". And the 99% rest of us are a bunch of big dummies. There's alot science gets wrong, but with space flight even science got this correct. The sphere is the most abundant geometric shape in Nature. The spiral is 2nd.

@AntiS0cial.S:  Man I'm late. 11 months! Sorry. But I just wanted to say, against your sarcastic video lol, would be that a clear debunk on Flat Earth is weather. (I think.) Weather would not exist on a flat earth since every single spot would receive the same amount of solar energy. No differential heating = no weather. Uh, water would be in one singular place and not touching the corners, and anyways..due to gravity, Earth would immediately squish itself into a sphere itself, or like you said, an oblate spheroid.

@AudioMasterclass replies to @AntiS0cial.S: Maybe the flat Earth is tilted; the Sahara closer to the sun, the Antarctic further away. Maps as we know them are distorted due to the misassumption that the Earth is a globe.

@mrx5574:  Again, no proof other than a guy that can't tell you what math formula he is trying to use. The camera lenses idea is okay to use. So where did you get the radius or diameter? There are too many mathematical errors here.

@AudioMasterclass replies to @mrx5574: So Mr. Clever Clogs, what are the errors?

@mrx5574 replies to @mrx5574: @AudioMasterclass  seriously? Why should I even start with an individual that can't read?

@AudioMasterclass replies to @mrx5574: Haha, you’ve got nothing!

@MosqueraManuelRoqueGomezDeOlea:  L

@Carl-mw3ft:  Our current astronomical model is the biggest load of Bullshit ever conceived. If Earth was the size of a 20mm dia marble the sun would be 234 m away, the Sun's light takes alledgedly 8,5 minutes to reach us but the nearest star alpha centauri (4,5 light years) would then be 69 000 km away on this scale. Total nonsense!!! Galaxies are alledgedly thousands of light years away. You wont get a more ridiculous theory on anything like our current astronomical model. Its a big black hole filled with "Expanding" Bullshit.

@Soundbrigade replies to @Carl-mw3ft: You suffer from personal incredulity. Just because you are ignorant, doesn’t dismiss facts.

@JohnWheeler-x1n:  Your wrong you bastard

@IsaiahMakariosChristopher-i9w:  I don't think the earth is flat

@jimwohlfeil-watson7656 replies to @IsaiahMakariosChristopher-i9w: Go do an experiment

@That_this_Dev:  How does the iss work? Why cant you see the whole world if you are in an plane? Why would you bring chatgpt into this? Why just why?

@garnet4846 replies to @That_this_Dev: Magical grabbity that just works.

@briankane6547:  https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=dave+mckeegan+size+of+earth

@briankane6547:  I suppose NASA is also responsible for this too? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0s5QsMMlX4 🙄

@memorysticky7581:  On a full moon the moon is round, at any angle. Now take a flat plate, hold it up in front of you and look at how round it is, now turn the plate and view it from and angle, does it still look round at that angle?

@IndustrialStrengthNY:  More idiots sounds great. World wide idiots

@salthe406th:  the only thing flat is your brain

@AudioMasterclass replies to @salthe406th: Haha that's funny. You have misunderstood the video though. Whose brain is flat now?

@salthe406th replies to @salthe406th: @@AudioMasterclass either you are ragebait or that you unironically believe the earth is still flat even though it has been disproven a thousand times

@AudioMasterclass replies to @salthe406th: @hello-im-sal-0406 Honestly, you haven’t understood the video.

@ethansheriff601:  Earth is not flat

@AudioMasterclass replies to @ethansheriff601: Oh dear. You didn’t understand my video. Watch it again and pay attention.

@Joey-wq7iw:  In all seriousness, the Earth is obviously flat. Everything taught in school is a lie for a reason. Unless you’re drinking flouride, it should be easy to see.

@utube4andydent:  Einstein was a great fan of the Thought Experiment. So many things discovered by one man doing this kind of mental thought process. By asking questions like this we can learn a lot.

@Haydenplaning_kingfish:  Do u have stupid 🌎 is an oval idiot

@yveslegault6825:  I guess the speaker's ECG is flat too.

@AudioMasterclass replies to @yveslegault6825: If you wait long enough it will be.

@dickmorton8335:  stuff made me fall asleep

@jcmurr2669:  I love it. The Globe is flat. Now everyone can be happy. Now flat earthers or anyone fo that matter pick a Shape you think the earth is. round, flat, square , triangle it doesn't matter. Just pick one and then shut up about it cuz nothing changes. You think it's flat, fine. Just shut up. You think it's a globe, cuz you have a brain larger than a grape that's fine just shut up about it.

@fredashay:  But did you know that birds aren't real?

@steveeasy8775:  Question for all you Baller's : Earth is roughly 70% water. The claim is that Earth curves 8in. per mile. So explain to THE WORLD then how Water can be Bent or Curved to MAKE this Magical-Spinning-Ball you Simpletons believe you're on? Im waiting. Anyone? Didn't think so. Stop all the DumbAssery and grow a BRAIN!

@daddy4934 replies to @steveeasy8775: It's supposed to be 8 inches per mile squared.
You start right off the bat by showing you've got no clue what you're talking about.
Now this formula is not used to measure the hidden height of anything behind the horizon.
It's an approximation which works on short distances only because it's a formula for a parabola, not a circle, and it only measures a drop at ground level as it doesn't account for the height of the observer, nor for refraction.

Water bends all the time under any force.
I see water curving every time I piss.

Your personal incredulity is only evidence that you are not as smart as you think you are that's all.

Just try and provide the accurate FE map.
If you can't then problem solved.

@Soundbrigade replies to @steveeasy8775: And even the correct 8 inches per mile squared is still just an approximation usable for shorter distances.
Next error: It is 70% of the earth’s surface that is covered with water and that water is held to the surface by gravity.
Next error: The Earth isn’t spinning. It is slowly rotating by 15 degrees per hour. An analog clock moves twice as fast.
Personal incredulity or “nuh-uh” or just simple ignorance does show you loose.

@KenHinnenkamp:  If water curved over a globe, photos of still lakes reflecting mountains would be distorted. If you have ever been to a funny house with curved mirrors you will understand what I am talking about.

@Soundbrigade replies to @KenHinnenkamp: Geometry wasn’t your best subject.

@evarchavex4800 replies to @KenHinnenkamp: 'If water curved over a globe, photos of still lakes reflecting mountains would be distorted. If you have ever been to a funny house with curved mirrors you will understand what I am talking about."

Too bad you're too re***ded to know that the mirrors are far more distorted than the still lakes.

@lukejones5272:  If you wanted to describe the earth's flatness as an engineering tolerance, you could use a 4000 mile radius (approximation) and the equation you used. You would get: two inches per mile, half inch per half mile, or eighth inch per quarter mile. Flat within an eighth of an inch per quarter mile is an engineering marvel.

@rollingthunder4599 replies to @lukejones5272: engineers never figure for curvature

@VinceTomJones:  ohh ffs sake.... rant much?

@anamnesiser:  Chat Gpt the truth 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@willdearden8373:  I'm guessing his pension is not meeting he needs.

@Jared-91:  It's funny people are actually arguing about it in the comments.

@TheFlerfamentSupervisor:  Flerfs have already tried to use ChatGPT to prove the Earth is flat for debate and got caught and laughed at for it. Austin Witless was one.

All they have to do is that the Earth is uncarbonated. Bingo, flat.

@wiggles7976:  A calculation like this is not difficult for me, so I'll do it. I don't know what the shape of just the blue part at 3:33 is, but let's call it a semihemisphere. Thus, a is the radius of the base of the semihemisphere, h is its height, r is the radius of the total sphere, and theta is the angle between the rounded tip of the semihemisphere and the sharp edge between the round part and the flat circle of the semihemisphere (vertex at sphere center). We have that sin(theta) = a/r, and in this case we can definitely use the small angle approximation and still be left with many digits of precision. Thus, theta = a/r. Now, since h + (r)cos(theta) = r, we have that h + (r)cos(a/r) = r, thus

h = r(1 - cos(a/r)).

The Taylor series for cos(x) is 1 - (x^2)/2 + (x^4)/24 - ..., but we still get many digits of precision by assuming cos(x) = 1 - (x^2)/2 due to x^4 being negligible compared to x^2. Thus,

h = r(1 - (1 - 0.5(a/r)^2) = r(0.5)(a/r)^2 = (a^2)/(2r).

This gets us all the precision we need, and thus h = ((50mm)^2)/(2*6371000000mm) = 0.196nm. ChatGPT was way off. This is much smaller than the irregularity of the light filter, assuming 380nm is correct. We can plug the exact value 6371000 - 6371000*cos(asin(0.05/6371000)) into wolfram alpha to see if I was lying about precision, and my approximation matched wolfram alpha's answer for 17 digits.

@AudioMasterclass replies to @wiggles7976: So is the Earth flat?

@wiggles7976 replies to @wiggles7976: @@AudioMasterclass If the 50mm diameter filter cap is flat, and it has a maximum height difference of 380nm, then since a 50mm diameter level circle on the earth's surface has a maximum height difference of only 0.196nm, the earth is about 2000 times flatter that the filter cap. It does sound strange that assuming Earth to be a sphere leads to the conclusion Earth is flat, but we can't argue with numbers. It looks like Earth is flat.

@AudioMasterclass replies to @wiggles7976: @@wiggles7976 You're a believer.

@itsbroplayzyt647 replies to @wiggles7976: ​@@wiggles7976the earth isnt flat cultist.

@itsbroplayzyt647 replies to @wiggles7976: ​@@AudioMasterclassyour a dumbass who didn't go to third grade.

@Robert08010:  So... you better mean its "flat" as opposed to "sharp" or I'm outta here! I waste enough time on idiots who think the earth is flat.

@richardlister1737:  By far the best episode of inspired nonsense I’ve seen in a long time! For the avoidance of doubt, that was a compliment. Quod erat demonstrandum, indeed? My response: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Let’s hope someone guards the guards who guard your padded cell. Lest you escape 😉

@AudioMasterclass replies to @richardlister1737: Illigitimi nil carborundum.

@richardlister1737 replies to @richardlister1737: @@AudioMasterclass haha! No, don’t.

@YilmazDurmaz:  "the earth is flat, but in nanometer scale" :) very nice!

By the way, equinox is nearing, and it is the day flat-earth destroyed to the core. why? sun rises at exactly east (or say, 90 degree from north) everywhere on earth (not at the same time everywhere, that would be crazy. I meant its rise over a single meridian of course), which would cause "infinite suns" if they were true. One of many geometry things by which the sun destroys flat ideas.

@uchechukwuowiriwa2353:  the bible says that there is water above our sky/heaven (Genesis 1:6-8) it says that our sky is hard (Job37:18) the bible says that the sun leaves it's chambers and runs its course with joy, that the sun has moves on its circuit from one end of the heavens to the other (psalm 19). This exposition about the nature of the sun is explained in detail in Joshua 10:13; for the sun was moving its course when it stopped over gibeon for one full day.

If you trust that God's word were not from the private interpretation of man but are indeed the inspired Word of God omniscient (most sovereign and most intelligent), if you believe God's word rather than NASA and godless college science then you will agree with me that the scriptures of the bible favor a geostationary earth with an enclosed geocentric cosmos rather than heliocentric globe earth copernican lie.

@h.dejong2531 replies to @uchechukwuowiriwa2353: Anyone can do simple experiments that prove Earth is a rotating sphere, and there's no dome above us.

@RidgewayMountainhauser replies to @uchechukwuowiriwa2353: " If you trust that God's word were not from the private interpretation of man but are indeed the inspired Word of God omniscient (most sovereign and most intelligent)"

that statement is the pinnacle of indoctrination.

the bible is a collection of occasionally noble iron age goat herder myths.

@MGoudsmits:  Flattards are probably as crazy as audiophiles. I found that after revisiting my old HiFi hobby and seeing all the sheit that is now on line from people who try to sell stuff that they make you believe do influence the sound quality. Many of them are so old, it is impossible they could even hear any differences they talk about. So my hobby the last 8 years countering flat earth frauds could use a shift as well and go fight audiophiles. What do you think?

@AudioMasterclass replies to @MGoudsmits: I could say stick to flat Earth because do I want competition on the topic of audiophiles? On the other hand there's the saying, 'A rising tide lifts all ships'. The problem is though that the oceans would spill over the edge.

@MGoudsmits replies to @MGoudsmits: @@AudioMasterclass LOL !

@YourRealityHasBeenUpdated:  This must be the british wits ;) . Thanks for the chuckle.

@BadTrip69:  The whole Earth is just a CD.

@thetelescopeguy0 replies to @BadTrip69: 💀💀💀

@hinesification:  That was great! I've seen some of the major debunkers (like Dave dave McKeegan) do similar calculations, but the direct comparison with the Hoya filter is great. I bet Dave pics that up, since he's a pretty solid photographer.

@markallen9495:  Good fun!

You definitely have the mind of a physicist! Two things I noted and liked from the video:

From experience, it seems that generally it's a relatively unknown anecdote amongst the general public, that the original definition of the metre as defined by the SI (or rather, their predecessors emerging from revolutionary France) was such that the distance from the equator to the poles would be exactly 10,000 km, providing a universal length and a unit of length that would be "for all people, for all time". Once one learns this anecdote, they're unlikely to forget either it, or the circumference of the earth, whereas I imagine just memorising the radius of the earth is the sort of thing that just falls out of peoples' heads on a regular basis.

Two, also from experience, when interacting with ChatGPT, you correctly point out that generally it's a good idea to have some sort of reasonable idea of what the answer should be beforehand, lest you be led astray. An enormous amount of my own queries have follow-up questions that go along the lines of "yes, but it isn't it the case that ______ is true/doesn't apply in this scenario", or with mock naïvety saying something like "oh, that's strange, I thought the answer would rely on the fact that ________", etc. and getting an "apology for my confusion" and a brand new answer that's far more plausible. Point being, that like so many advanced tools, ChatGPT is a godsend and a huge timesaver, but only when you already know the fundamentals, but very easy to get led down the garden path or completely stuck if you can't tell a plausible answer from nonsense.

There are so analogous situations to this in the world that are fun to recognise, e.g.
* Understanding computer architecture, low level programming languages and fundamental algorithms before graduating to the real world of high-level languages, automatic memory management, and solving every problem by downloading a library to do it for you.
* Understanding calculus and linear algebra etc. before getting Mathematica to solve all these problems for you.
* First developing a keen ear and a tactile connection to the music to allow beatmatching two records manually or playing in time, hearing when something is out of tune, or when a frequency in a track needs to be attenuated, rather than relying on SYNC buttons and automatic tools to do this for you, again at least at first.

I call this the ladder principle, after Wittgenstein's statement at the end of the Tractatus that:

"My propositions serve as elucidations in the following way: anyone who understands me eventually recognizes them as nonsensical, when he has used them—as steps—to climb beyond them. (He must, so to speak, throw away the ladder after he has climbed up it.)

He must transcend these propositions, and then he will see the world aright."

@AudioMasterclass replies to @markallen9495: Things would be a lot easier if the French had made the metre the same as the yard.

@louismarina7225:  I used a spherical cow in a vacuum and the result was more accurate

@Astronomator:  This is such a delightful abomination of a video. Thank you for going to the trouble of putting it together. Also, warm regards from a fellow math/physics junkie. 😜

@AudioMasterclass replies to @Astronomator: I get these crazy ideas in my sleep.

@philipfreeman72:  Its way easier to see impossiball . Do you actually believe Earth is spinning at 1000 mph impossiball . 70 % of Earth is water just try to curve some water . There are thousands of proofs .

@Ben-no4lz replies to @philipfreeman72: It’s spinning at 0.000694RPM

70% of the Surface is covered in a thin film of water.
If the earth was the size of a basketball, the depth of the ocean would be the width of a Human Hair.

“Just try to curve some water” - you mean like what’s been observed by ever person to ever stand on a beach?

Or how about the Flat Earther produced Documentary “Behind the Curve” - where they set up a light trap experiment along a stretch of canal & end up having to hold 1 sensor 2 feet higher than the other….thus demonstrating a curve.


If I stand on the beach where i live, I can see ships until they are 3 miles from shore.
If I stand on the cliffs 40 feet above the beach, I can now see ships until 9 miles from shore.
That is the EXACT correlation between Elevation & Visual Range I would see on a Sphere with a Circumference of 24,900 miles……that’s basic Geometry.

@DynamicAudio:  Haha...no matter if everyone agrees with you or not; but you do have a way with words which is unique...your sarcasm and cynicism is next level...love it.

@MrCheswickMusic:  Stick to doing audio old timer, critical thinking & demonstrable reality isn't your forte

@AudioMasterclass replies to @MrCheswickMusic: No thank you.

@MrCheswickMusic replies to @MrCheswickMusic: @@AudioMasterclass Well, in that case then, seeing as you know so much about this subject, can you practically demonstrate to your audience how a standing body of water, such as an ocean, can physically adhere & bend around a 1000 mph spinning ball floating in a vacuum? A scaled down model will suffice

Then, demonstrate to your audience how you can create pressure without some form of containment, EG: if the earth is a pressurised environment, then how is that pressure being created?

Please practically demonstrate your quite frankly absurd claims & beliefs, I'll wait

@AudioMasterclass replies to @MrCheswickMusic: Good golly gosh, you haven't understood the video at all. You should probably stay quiet in case anyone notices.

@MrCheswickMusic replies to @MrCheswickMusic: @@AudioMasterclass I'll take that as a "No, I can't provide the practical real world demonstrations you asked for" then shall I?

Typical, globe cult belief, all talk no action

@MrEjwheeler replies to @MrCheswickMusic: @@MrCheswickMusic "can you practically demonstrate to your audience how a standing body of water, such as an ocean, can physically adhere & bend around a 1000 mph spinning ball floating in a vacuum? "

Gravity.

"A scaled down model will suffice"

Sure, only problem is the first step would be to get rid of the earth, since it's this pesky mass attracting all the water to it.
Of course you could just look at experiments done aboard the ISS, Chinese space station or zero-g flights that show water naturally forming into spheres.

"If the earth is a pressurised environment, then how is that pressure being created?"

Gravity.

You never answered last time so I'll ask again: do you get some sort of perverse satisfaction from advertising your stupidity to the internet?

@MarcellsWorldJjr:  the rainbow proves the firmament dome under water. The earth is flat and is on pillars

@MrEjwheeler replies to @MarcellsWorldJjr: Sorry but "muh holy book" isn't evidence, and rainbows prove no such thing.

@evasuser:  The Earth is flat.

@MrEjwheeler replies to @evasuser: Incorrect.

@mr.c8033 replies to @evasuser: The earth is indeed, FLAT.@@MrEjwheeler

@MrEjwheeler replies to @evasuser: @@mr.c8033 Strange, since all the evidence says otherwise.

@mr.c8033 replies to @evasuser: You have zero evidence. None. However, if you'd like absolute proof the earth is indeed flat, I will provide that for you, if you have any discernment at all. NASA says the earth has a curvature of 8" per mile squared. Be prepared to get your mind blowin' - if you dare. Which I doubt.

.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBE1VbjxPCU&t=951s
@@MrEjwheeler

@dtearpak replies to @evasuser: What do you have to defend ur statement

@csgamer6973:  I watch this channel when im on dmt. Great as always!

@syanhc:  I find the title of these videos are click bait.

@AudioMasterclass replies to @syanhc: Try this - https://youtu.be/cxoRcsmb2Ww

@suzi4723:  I've always known it..thx for confirming 🤪👍

@paulroseartanddesign:  I find it interesting, the "development" of the Flat Earth Theory. I believe flat earthers take their inspiration from the biblical account of earth being covered by an (impenetrable?) dome - "the firmament". The bible seems to be a cover up document, usurping history and rewriting it to control humanity and its beliefs. What if the development of the "firmament" story was part of this control mechanism? If our history does contain multiple ET elements, and that our ancestors/progenitors/creators came from the stars, would it help the authors of the bible, and the controllers of humanity, to literally "put a lid" on such legends, by claiming the earth is a closed system, within a firmament dome? In this way, believers would have a clear reason to discredit tales of ET history as impossible, and fake.

@nickdryad:  Do not watch if you have an Irony deficiency. Anyway, once you started talking in mathematical terms I reverted to my high school self and drew a guitar on the table.

@AudioMasterclass replies to @nickdryad: A guitar? Could have been worse.

@anamnesiser:  Three steps 1. Buy a zoom camera 2. Go and check 3. Think critically
The truth can defend itself.

@MrCheswickMusic replies to @anamnesiser: How do the oceans of earth bend around a 1000 mph spinning ball?

@anamnesiser replies to @anamnesiser: @@MrCheswickMusic GRABBITY 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@MrCheswickMusic replies to @anamnesiser: @@anamnesiser Ha ha, ahhh yes, the gravity card, the last refuge of someone with no answers or demonstrations, love it

@anamnesiser replies to @anamnesiser: @MrCheswickMusic  the fantastical magical glue that holds the bullsh1t together 🤣

@MrCheswickMusic replies to @anamnesiser: @@anamnesiser Ha ha exactly mate

@s_r_v:  Funny video well done 😂 seriously though I genuinely can't understand why people want to believe the earth is flat though...

@MrCheswickMusic replies to @s_r_v: How come you can't observe, sense or measure yourself spinning @ 1000 mph?

@jackmehoff5354 replies to @s_r_v: @@MrCheswickMusic How about the fact they say the earth is going 500,000 miles per hour around the sun and moon... 
that's even harder to observe, sense or measure

@shaylehirschman1748:  Fun through satire, as the premise doesn’t make sense. The formula for the variation of curve of a flat lens, provided here, makes no sense when applied to a globe. The height from the globe’s center to all points on the globe is the same height- the radius. You cannot prove a surface is flat by using a formula that cannot be applied to globes (r is too large in all dimensions relative to surface variation). But this would make a great April Fools joke!

@SPINNINGMYWHEELS777:  didn't you know they have flattened the flat earth rhetoric with the bookend 'but may be convex in nature and a more complex structure we did not determine when it was flat"... 😂 I'm laughing because a major flat earth proselytizer stated this just last month without qualms

@AlanSwain-k7p:  So much sense. Where have you been all my life? Brilliant!

@michaeldeloatch7461:  My receiver's bass and treble knobs each have a notation "FLAT" at the very center. It can be no coincidence that same, very center is also at the top of the semicircle the sweep of the pots describes -- just like in your diagram at the earth's summit.

@PaulHaussler-bs1qi:  British humor... Love it!!!

Paul H. in Huntington Beach, CA, USA

@eldergod4809 replies to @PaulHaussler-bs1qi: I know right, what's more funnier is the American humour

@daviddunmore7076:  The only flat 'planet' I know of is Terry Pratchett's Discworld.

@TheFlerfamentSupervisor replies to @daviddunmore7076: The Turtle Moves.

@johnkortink8133:  I think a mental breakdown is imminent.

@AudioMasterclass replies to @johnkortink8133: You should see a qualified professional immediately.

@joso5554:  Silly and boring. Pointless and not fun for a second.
Wrong assumptions lead to wrong conclusions. We already knew that.

@humblestever24:  Next time you're going on a plane take a spirit level with you. You'll notice apart from when climbing or descending the spirit level shows a level surface. This is because the world is flat.
Thanks for the change in topic. Audio is much simpler- it either sounds good or it doesn't.

@GuardianSoulkeeper replies to @humblestever24: No, that would prove you had a smooth flight.

Bring a set of jewellers scales instead. If you're travelling to a different latitude then the apparent weight of a test weight will change - getting lighter the closer you get to the equator. That effect is caused by the rotation of the Earth.

@humblestever24 replies to @humblestever24: @@GuardianSoulkeeper But you haven't factored in the pressurized cabin. Please think before posting.

@Ben-no4lz replies to @humblestever24: You know why?
Because the adjustment needed to maintain a fixed altitude is 0.0143 degrees per mile.

Even a Laser level will struggle to detect such a small gradient.

@MrCheswickMusic replies to @humblestever24: @@GuardianSoulkeeper Ha ha, in that case then, I'm going to buy all my gold at the equator and sell it up north for a profit, man, what an Idiot ha ha

@humblestever24 replies to @humblestever24: @@Ben-no4lz Of course it will struggle. A laser works at the speed of light. Snail mail ! Well over a second from the moon?? C'mon man.

@straymusictracksfromdavoro6510:  Yes, of course, the notion that the Earth is round, roundish or a “geoid”, (as suggested by the scientific surveyors), which is promulgated by the “Round Earthers” (RE’s) is so preposterous it’s laughable. There are at least three very solid compelling arguments that prove how ridiculous this ideology is. Firstly, if the earth was roundish, it would immediately be obvious during any ball game played in the supposed “Northern Hemisphere”, when outside, such as football, tennis and the rugby codes, as the ball, when not in play, would never come to rest. It would always continue to roll in a direction towards to the low side of the earth, say the corners or back or front of the “field” (depending on where you were on the curved surface), only stopping when it hit a fence or the foot of some unsuspecting player who was bracing themselves against that inexorable downward pull. Secondly, I live in the supposed “Southern Hemisphere”, supposedly on the “bum” side of the earth and I would certainly not be here to write this comment if that was true as if I left my house, if it could be built, I would certainly fly away into the deep dark depths of the fictional “space”. Thirdly, and far more conclusively, the great scientist Dr Terry Pratchett, god rest his soul, set out very conclusively the reality of the earth in his famous thesis which ran to 41 volumes which he titled “Discworld” not to offend the RE’s and others involved in the great conspiracy, it seems that this magnificent scientific tome has largely (and no doubt deliberately) been ignored by the bogus “scientific community”. Put more simply I relate to a gentleman I once read about, who held some very worthwhile theories, that were ridiculously dismissed by the cabal of the controlling society as “conspiracies”, when asked what proof he had, he eloquently answered simply, “Well it’s just common sense really” - enough said. Thank you for the great video

@Zodiac4711 replies to @straymusictracksfromdavoro6510: "It would always continue to roll in a direction towards to the low side of the earth"
Wow.
Another flattie who don't know what down means on a globe.
😅

@allenjgoldberg6960:  I really wish you’d ignore the idiots and devote yourself instead to we others who admire your experience and know-how. IMHO the best way to deal with the ranks of idiots is to offer them no attention at all.

@beats_audio_:  When I poured water on my balcony, it rolled towards the drain. From then on I came to know that the Earth is tilted. 🤣

@ChihuaVid:  I feel like a Flatearther listenig to my - out of phase stereo baffle- with ports pointing to the sides, it is almost like a sin but I can hear a great stereo separation, no crosstalk and deep base... I would like to contact someone who would listen to it and tell me if they might have something to contribute to the knowledge of audio. I am a Mexican strugling to write in English

@BeyondTheIce-p1j:  Flat earth in 5 mins video

@billymack533:  I watch this channel late at night when I’m high so this one really baffled me as you can imagine

@markksargent:  Long Live Flat Earth

@rufusredneck3981 replies to @markksargent: Well said Mark, distinct lack of non Google research here. It's a bit like those MagicEye pictures we used to stare at. Once you see it you cannot unsee it. David Weiss is still offering three Bitcoin for one globe proof; come on helio lovers, how hard can it be!

@MrEjwheeler replies to @markksargent: Mark demonstrating how irrefutably stupid he is by not even realising the video is taking the piss out of his dumb pizza planet.

@MrEjwheeler replies to @markksargent: @@rufusredneck3981 "David Weiss is still offering three Bitcoin for one globe proof"

Has he put them into escrow yet, and set up an independent judge to determine the evidence?

Of course he hasn't because he's nothing but a conman shilling a living through a useless app, being an oxygen thief too dumb to hold down a real job, like Mark here.

@garnet4846 replies to @markksargent: This guy above is a shill.

@jimwohlfeil-watson7656 replies to @markksargent: ​@@garnet4846this guy suffer from Cognitive Dissonance Disorder

@logotrikes:  I asked a pilot what he thought on an international flight once. The earth is both round and flat, he said. From this I think he was saying is that the earth is flat but round in shape. Like a dinner plate say. Intellectually this sounds right to me. However from the first day of school as a five year old, I was introduced to the spinning globe on its stand.

So the indoctrination began and has continued to this very day 71 years later.

I believe the flat earth model and have for many years once I shook off the indoctrination....

@Ben-no4lz replies to @logotrikes: So you believe a “Model” that is in direct opposition to actual observable reality.

@logotrikes replies to @logotrikes: @@Ben-no4lz So tell me Ben, have you observed that the earth is actually round? Reference to it appearing curved out of airplane windows doesn't cut it. The glass is curved and gives the appearance of curvature. The pilots windows are flat by legislation and they get an entirely different view to a passenger. They get a flat horizon. There's plenty of vids on the interwebs showing the cockpit view of a flat horizon...

Many experiments have been done which demonstrate the earth is flat, but none, as far as I'm aware of the opposite. "Movies" from NASA don't count because they've admitted that it's all photoshop.

A pilot will tell you that pushing forward on the joystick all the time to hug the curve is erroneous. The attitude of a plane is nose up a few degrees all the way on level flight on any commercial or international flight. Nose up...

No, I'm not convinced the earth is a ball except being told so for the past 76 of my years. I've seen nothing in all that time to convince me otherwise despite all the propaganda and brainwashing...


Have you ever wondered why the so-called astronauts on the moon took hardly any pictures of Earth, when all they had to do was look up and click? They took plenty pictures of moon rocks and lunar dust and landscape. They went ballistic with their cameras, thousands and thousands of moon pictures, but nothing of the big blue ball just by looking up.

The only extant pictures of Earth and so-called "Earth rise" are photoshopped or the equivalent of what was available in the 60's. The "famous" extremely contrived picture of an astronaut, a flag, and the Earth shows on closer inspection with the gamma turned up that the Earth was pasted into place. There is a clearly visible oblong surrounding this "Earth" which is a different shade to the rest of the sky. It's been added in. Not remotely questionable. So who is kidding who?

The Webb telescope is manually controlled from Earth. Ever wondered why they don't turn the thing around and take magnificent pictures of Earth. But no, not one.They can do it, but haven't. Why not? Wouldn't the public love to see their home world in blazing colour? I would. But they won't because they're hiding something. Plenty of opportunities over the past 60 or so years. Sophisticated technology, but no pictures. I don't know the exact reason of course, but I could make a good guess...

I don't have a horse in the race. The earth can be flat, square, a cube, rectangi-circuloid or banana-shaped for all I care. What I do like is truth, and I don't think we're getting it here...

@Ben-no4lz replies to @logotrikes: @@logotrikes Yes I have, and so have you.


Ever stood on a beach and watched clouds and ships come and go over the horizon?

Ever seen the Round shadow of the earth on the moon during an Eclipse?

Ever noticed how the higher you climb, the further you can see?
Because climbing higher allows you to see Over the Curve of the horizon.

Ever done long distance shooting?
Because anyone who has will confirm that you have to account for the curvature and rotation of the earth if you want to hit your target.

Ever noticed how the stars rotate Anti-clockwise in the Northern Hemisphere & Clockwise in the Southern Hemisphere?
Literally only possible if the 2 hemispheres are on opposite side of a spinning globe.

How do you explain timezones?
Because if the earth was flat, sunrise/sunset would happen at the same time everywhere.


Your pilot comment shows you have the same grasp of basic Geometry as the average 6 year old.
On a sphere with a circumference of 24900 miles, do you know how much of a “nose down adjustment” a plane would need to make in order to maintain a fixed altitude?…..0.0143 degrees per mile.
Which is so slight the changes in air pressure and elevator trim on the plane will do it automatically.

@MrEjwheeler replies to @logotrikes: @@logotrikes "Many experiments have been done which demonstrate the earth is flat"

Go on then, name just one.

@logotrikes replies to @logotrikes: @@MrEjwheeler Really? Do I have to? The Bedford Level Experiment. Duplicated many times since its inception in 1838. Results are sometimes fuzzy though, so it's not a good example.

Many laser experiments over vast inland lakes have shown some good results. Lasers being reflected by a mirror on the opposite shore.

There was a recent YouTube clip where the guy did some measuring which showed two flat areas both in the US. One a lake and one across land distance. I wish I'd kept it or knew where it is. The lake one was very convincing, though I don't remember his measurement technique. Something to do with sonar or radar or something. I'll see if I can find it, and provided I don't lose you, I'll send a link..

Many land/sea observations using telephoto lens to show that a ship that has apparently gone over the curve is still there once zoomed in sufficiently. Now you don't see it, now you do.

The Chicago skyline, where buildings should be seen as being underwater according to the geometry of what is it? 8 feet per mile squared. Seen from an opposite shoreline some 50 miles away, the foundations of these buildings spring back into view with a telephoto lens. Numerous examples exist...

The Chicago example, a news anchor said "What you're seeing is a mirage" Mirages don't quite act that way sonny...

With a skyline that is curving away from the viewer, the horizon should dip with it. But the horizon always stays at eye level. That's how you know you're on a flat plane...

Theres a balloon experiment 100,000 feet or something, using a GoPro, with a straight lens not a fish eye lens. Rotated 360 degrees and a straight supporting rod acting as proof that the lens is not fish-eye, one sees a flat horizon 360 round. You also see the sun showing a localised hot spot on the clouds underneath, something a 93 million mile distant sun should not do, but that's for another conversation. Isaac Newton in his Principia Mathmatica wrote that we really don't know how far away the sun is and 93 million miles is as good a number as any other. Some good guesses have been made scientifically using parallax, but it's still not clear what the mean distance the sun is from Earth, assuming a ball.

Recent declassified docs show the USAF and others conducted high altitude tests over the years "...assuming a flat non-rotating Earth." Maybe it was better to do the math this way rather than variables introduced by a rotating globe earth model I don't know, but it still begs the obvious question...

I've given you several Mr EJ. Perhaps you'll return the compliment....?

@cambee3070:  Why do you think that you live on a magical spinning waterball flying through outer space fantasy land with people walking on the sides of it?

@cambee3070 replies to @cambee3070: @JohnHazenhousen oh then tell me more lol. What do you believe?

@MrEjwheeler replies to @cambee3070: Why do you think that you live on a magical dirt pizza sitting in an invisible dome?

@cambee3070 replies to @cambee3070: @@MrEjwheeler why’d you strawman me? I don’t make the positive claim of knowing the shape of the earth. Do you?

@MrEjwheeler replies to @cambee3070: @@cambee3070 You said the exact same dumb thing that flat earthers say, and you deny that the earth is a globe so it's pretty safe to assume that you're a flat earther.

Yes, I know that the earth is a sphere. Why don't you?

@Semper_Fish replies to @cambee3070: ​@@MrEjwheelerYou don't even know the specs of the globe you claim to be on... and you think you're the educated one.

@__ZANE__:  time for your 6th jab grampa

@__ZANE__ replies to @__ZANE__: @AnonYmous-yj9ibtell that to snoop's daughter and lebron's son

@MrEjwheeler replies to @__ZANE__: @@__ZANE__ tell that to Rob Skiba

@__ZANE__ replies to @__ZANE__: @@MrEjwheelerLike Bob, Skiba was CIA. An actor/infiltrator. they off'd his character to try and convince truthers to get the jab.

@MrEjwheeler replies to @__ZANE__: @@__ZANE__ Might want to loosen your tinfoil hat a bit there.

@MrCheswickMusic replies to @__ZANE__: @@MrEjwheeler What jab are you up to now Einstein, is it 6 or 7, and are you still mixing & matching, or are you strictly a Pfizer fan?

@BeansAndToast-m7t:  I genuinely can't tell if your joking or not.

@Barium-carbonate:  What a retard I’m so out of your Chanel

@tubefreeeasy:  At least ‘flat earthers’ will fall off the side of the earth because they don’t believe the cables will help them out.

@tubefreeeasy replies to @tubefreeeasy: Sorry, I do have a different interpretation of what a flat earther is.
I like your precision of literacy.

@NathanOakley1980 replies to @tubefreeeasy: @@tubefreeeasyit’s called a stereotype fallacy.

How flat an oblate spheroid is, is oxymoronic!

@NathanOakley1980:  Thank you for being moderately respectful. I will extend you the same courtesy when I cover this video. Earth is flat. You can only get elevation angle measurements 📐 from a flat plane, you can not get an elevation angle measurement from a sphere earth. It’s game over. Elevation angle measurement proves flat earth. The world was mapped flat and it is build on flat. If you are actually serious about looking into this subject look into celestial navigation. It’s how the world was charted using an angle measurement 📐 to Polaris. This gives you latitude. The you do the same with the sun for longitude. Earth must be flat to use this system, precisely as we do!

You get that radius value you used in your sphere assuming maths, by measuring the minimum elevation angle (flat earth required) to Polaris (equator) the celestial sphere has all been measured with respect to a flat earth, more specifically the equatorial plane. Earth is measured flat. All globe claims including yours have their genesis in flat earth measurements to the stars.

I’ll cover your video on my show one day next week, with specific focus on where you got that “radius” value you assumed….it was measured from a flat earth as detailed above.

If you want more homework, ask yourself why maps are flat then look at “areas of equal altitude”. The equator is one! We use it for latitude as we approach Polaris the angle 📐 (flat earth required) increases with respect to the horizon, a tool also used in navigation for establishing earth flat so we can use it for angle measurement. Perhaps in your globe world of radius values measured off a flat earth you get angles (two straight lines) off a curved surface 🤔 nope! Earth MUST BE and is measured flat, even for your globe beliefs. As I say, I’ll cover your video in the next few days. You’ll know as I’ll send a bunch of viewers to like and comment on this video. Hope you can check it out. I’ve been covering the subject on YouTube for 10 years.

@NathanOakley1980 replies to @NathanOakley1980: You can also get that radius value you assume using Al-Biruni’s method where he measured the height of a mountain using angles off a flat earth once he has these flat earth angles he can figure out the height of the mountain with trig, then assuming the ground he just measured flat now curves under the mountain he can then derive the differential between eye level (flat earth required) and surface level (flat earth requirement also). Again as stated above, earth was measured flat to get the Radius value assumed in your maths. It’s the same eye level and surface level differential that give you your begging the question, proof of nothing perspective hijacking, earth curve calculators. They too infer earth curve using a radius value measurement taken from a flat earth angle 📐 and uses it to give you a tangent point horizon below surface level (flat earth required) using the difference between eye level (flat earth required) and surface level (flat earth requirement also).

As you can tell I have 100s of ways to show earth is measured flat, and every globe claim ever, will also use these flat earth measurements. Hope this helps.

@stevevender1154 replies to @NathanOakley1980: It was a joke. 🙄

@BriansLogic replies to @NathanOakley1980: @@stevevender1154Not to us it’s not ?

@stevevender1154 replies to @NathanOakley1980: @@BriansLogiclol, good luck with that. 😂

@BriansLogic replies to @NathanOakley1980: @@stevevender1154 I don’t need luck I just need proof and evidence which I have :)

@rabit818:  I want my music frequency response to be flat

@NathanOakley1980 replies to @rabit818: My room acoustics are as flat as the earth!

But seriously, I get +/- 6db in my heavily treated room from 25hz to 17Khz, sounds amazing!


Also, earth is measured flat!

@Gguitarist1:  I'm uncomfortably obsessed with the "American Gothic" painting on the wall behind you.
What gives?

@AudioMasterclass replies to @Gguitarist1: There's another painting to the right. Maybe you can obsess over that one too.

@Gguitarist1 replies to @Gguitarist1: I can't tell what the other one is.
OK. So now I have to ask, why "American Gothic"?
BTW, I very much enjoy your YouTube channel. Informative, Insightful, and Entertaining.

@AudioMasterclass replies to @Gguitarist1: @@Gguitarist1 There is no reason other than I like it, like I like many artworks. As for the other one, I like that too. Oh yes, and they're both out of copyright so no problems there.

@Gguitarist1 replies to @Gguitarist1: 👍✌️

@CraigPMiller:  The Earth isn’t flat it’s sharp! 😃😎

@NathanOakley1980 replies to @CraigPMiller: It’s measured flat.

@CraigPMiller replies to @CraigPMiller: @@NathanOakley1980 Sorry, my comment was meant to be a musical 'flats and sharps' joke-pun.

@keithandrewneal:  If the earth is flat, why do airlines not fly their planes in straight lines. I would like to see a map of the earth if it were flat. All aircraft from the USA flying to Asia would have to fly over Europe. Flat earthers are just deluded idiots.

@robbedoeslegrand236:  Everybody knows the Earth is round. Just like a pancake. 🤔

@NathanOakley1980 replies to @robbedoeslegrand236: Naa it’s measured flat using angles off a flat plane to the stars ✨

That’s why all the maps are flat. You can’t draw areas of equal altitude, or measure angles from a sphere, that’s just silly.

@r1p2m32:  Thanks, important and useful to know! Unfortunately none of the flat-earthers understand numbers or geometry.

@NathanOakley1980 replies to @r1p2m32: Stereotype fallacy.

@garnet4846 replies to @r1p2m32: We understand that 8" per mile squared doesn't work.

@Synthematix:  It is true, the earth is indeed flat, i popped out to get some milk on the weston-super-mare seafront and just as i crossed the road on the high street i fell off the edge, im now orbiting space at roughly 57mph

@NathanOakley1980 replies to @Synthematix: argumentum ad absurdum

@NathanOakley1980 replies to @Synthematix: Earth is measured flat using the stars ✨ You can only get elevation angle measurements to the stars 📐 from a flat plane, you can not get an elevation angle measurement from a sphere earth. It’s game over. Elevation angle measurement proves flat earth.

^^^ this is called “a rebuttal”.

@Synthematix replies to @Synthematix: Rectum ad absurdum@@NathanOakley1980

@vendelius:  No wonder I have been feeling a bit flat lately!.. Thank you Doctor..

@suzi4723 replies to @vendelius: 😂

@evenblackercrow4476:  lol

@evenblackercrow4476 replies to @evenblackercrow4476: I don't know what that means, so I'm going to ignore it. My words to live by, too.

@rstknives2423:  The Earth won't be flat if you stop using flat cables.