If you can't hear this then you're not an audiophile
Comments on this video
You can comment on this video at YouTube
You can comment on this video at YouTube
Tuesday June 6, 2023
David Mellor
David Mellor is CEO and Course Director of Audio Masterclass. David has designed courses in audio education and training since 1986 and is the publisher and principal writer of Adventures In Audio.
@SeanWyseman replies to @AudioMasterclass: There is NO problem. It's not a problem at all except to you. Your ignorance is making what is common use into a problem. That's weird - & is not representative of reality in song production. If you're really an audiophile you're stepping outside your field & commenting on a completely different field but spouting ignorance. You're in no position to comment on the recording business & it's techniques - having already demonstrated you don't know your stuff. Other producers have commented here also - producers who know their craft.
@erikbrodin2198 replies to @AudioMasterclass: @SeanWysemanalso sounds perfectly fine in mono so I don’t know what exactly is the point other than to pontificate on needless bs caused by other needless bs
@jamesportrais3946 replies to @AudioMasterclass: @AudioMasterclass - Most entertaining, but I must take a ittle bit of an issue.
I manufacture high-end analog components. I'm also a musician, and have played numerous instruments in bands & orchestras of all denomination. I know what real music sounds like in all manner of venues.
I simply don't quite understand your fixation on imagery. I'm listening to my workshop set-up which is basic & limited, but hilariously good! Everyone is gobsmacked by the realism - I played the CD of a sadly late friend, Nigel Richard; bagpipe builder and player extraordinare. He (without provocation) said it sounded just exactly as it did in the recording studio. Amazing what O/B's and concrete walls can acheive.
My workshop isn't very large - maybe 5 x 7 metres with the O/B's maybe 2.5 metres from me, situated roughly 1/3rd along the 7mtr, with me near the end wall. The OB's & I occupy that 1/3rd the space, the remainder of which is occupied by the apparitions of melodic performance. A nicely recorded small set up even taken from youtube can sound unnervingly real:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mCCMhuKEYw&ab_channel=JasonMraz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIyVu0Ucz8U&ab_channel=SouthernRaised
Well, they genuinely could fit in my room, and they do. Take that second track - the banjo starts right in the far right corner of the room from me. Sounds real - it's there. Rest is kinda mushed towards the centre left with the vocals about a metre forward. Nothing great going on with the imagery here, so why does it sound this good? Without paying autistic levels of scrutiny to imagery (I can feel roughly where it is, and thats no where near the speakers) and I get a strong impression of presence.
Go to the first track. Practically mono. In these sort of live gigs, the speakers could be anywhere but I'm pretty certain I'm hearing the best version taken straight from the mixer desk and post eq-d. Pretty sure it's not the imagery that's doing it for me now?
Neither of the above tracks require ear-splitting volume - you should always listen at realistic levels for acoustic music. Unfortunately for those desiring of orchestral levels of performance, some 106dB will be required.
I don't believe that imagery is as important as you appear to insist. Yes, I have tracks that move backward & forward, left and right. Sure it's a factor, but it's certainly not the most important - otherwise mono would be entirely redundant.Is there no such a thing as a mono oriented audiophile?
@SeanWyseman replies to @AudioMasterclass: @jamesportrais3946 The guy doesn't know his stuff. He doesn't know that there are 3 distinct disciplines & 5 more sub-disciplines that are normally divided up among as many people.
Sometimes you get someone who does it all. But those jobs are divided up - even in the mind of the person that wears every hat. I'm one of them that often does every stage himself because I'm good a them.
But when he enters the dialog with a bold & blatant statement that "you're not an audiophile if you can't hear this" - which is really clickbait because it's false. You can find all kinds of misinformation on YT & this is a perfect example. A guy grandstanding with an opening headline that knows not what & audiophile is. Then says you're not one if you can't hear this. Ridiculous. No audiophile is accurately described as such.
It may be an audiophile who's using his mixing appreciation skills - but that's not an audiophile's domain - figuring out if the mix engineer should have made the right artistic choice. That's not an audiophile that's making those observations even if he considers himself an audiophile - he's not talking about the fidelity of the sound - which is what defines an audiophile.
Why is important to make the correct distinctions - it's not that important unless you want to communicate it to others. Then it's important that you know the roles & definitions or you'll not gain an credibility by not knowing your topic more deeply than the public you are communicating with. This guy doesn't know his topic.
@jamesportrais3946 replies to @AudioMasterclass: @SeanWyseman I'm in your camp Sean, but I'm not certain he needs to be eviscerated 😛 - I can see why you were annoyed, but the guy is trying to promote his channel/business. We only learn through mistakes, and the modern culture of cancellation hardly allows any degree of growth.
I think the guy has 10 years on me which would mean that his formative years would have come from the late 70's-80's when "specifications" sold typically solid-state amplification. Let's not forget that only a couple of decades previously, your audio aspirations would be curtailed by a furniture-centric wife. I've seen "high end" radiograms from the late 60's/early 70's that had speakers, radio, TT, O/R tape recorder, fridge & cocktail bar (seriously!) all built in.
I'm sure you can see where I'm going with this. Early SS equipment sounded on the whole shyte but measured brilliantly. This was the era when the likes of Krell was king; megawatts & miniscule distortion combined with practically unlimited bandwidth & vanishing noise. All very nice, but sounded crap. Sandpaper treble, paper mids, bass that you couldn't distinguish from external traffic (you got pumped when you thought a truck on the road outside was part of the plot) and absolutely no depth - your program was nailed to a perspex sheet between your probably three-way speakers with seriously shyte crossovers. Everything we hated about early CD players was encapsulated in this meandering mess.
What that equipment could do was image. Inherently more consistently reproducible semi conductors meant consistence throughout the bandwidth. This means that a fixed pan-point is less likely to wander with varying degrees of frequency. If that's your only selling point, might as well push it - so they did.
Sean, I don't think our man has ever heard a proper stereo soundscape. My experience for more than a few decades has been one that you feel you could walk into. More than a few visitors go looking to the rear wall in order to find additional speakers that aren't there. Funny thing is, being O/B's, they turn around and hear the same phenominon!
I'd like our man to pay a few visits to very different set ups and gain a little experience. His writing, or rather talking doesn't smack of someone who's heard a Class A single ended micro-Watt set-up for example.
Your thoughts Sean?
@TheScreechingPickle: I was looking even deeper. You can hear this ticking noise that is probably hand movements or something.
@Porsche996TT: I heard it through my HD202 II
@PrinceSingh-rg2qx: Me listening with one side headphones 😂 one is on charging
@stephen579: It's difficult to hear from my laptop.
@элегантный_джентльмен2: I just thought this flute sounds weird 😂
@owenbevans6062: It's a clarinet it's supposed to sound like a butterfly fluttering around.
@simpilotadamt1012: I thought that was intentional panning and not something necessarily wrong with the music :<
@averagejoe175: Am I the only one that just heard an annoying clicking
@thydevdom: In the great words of some man, sometimes, you don't know what you don't know because you didn't know what you were supposed to know about it. This applies here.
@The340king: There was no way I could have heard it. I was listening with just my center speaker as I have my mains on another system doing some speaker development, like an audiophile. Lol's
@decnijfkris3706: Sennheiser makes failing consumer goods for which customers pay triple prices. No aftersales, they will send you to the page to buy new. A scandal, so do not buy Sennheiser.
@VernaWilt: The panning is totally natural to the flow of music & personally makes it sound richer. But what I did hear was it was absolutely not blended very well. Another words the volume on that instrument was overbearing, even for a solo...
@VernaWilt: 🫢 Im an audiophile an totally think spending 1K ^ on gold plated cables makes things sound better after the other 2mi of copper in the equipment.. Lol
@wayland7150: I used copper cables with my speakers but found some silver speaker cables and I tried them for a joke. The joke was on me because the silver cables gave a much clearer sound. I really was not expecting that.
@schrissi6366: I love music, but i am not an audiophile as i noticed thanks to you video. Because i hear the music, the clear recording and enjoyed the music. I did notice that the Clarinet Sounds are going from left to right, but i didnt noticed it in that way, that it could be a mistake / error / something the toneengeneer did wrong.
As you said, i think it a manner of personal preferences / or taste. And as one other person commented: i think audophiles buys audio equipment to listen the recording/technique/perfect balancing/ or just the equiment.
@alittlelooney5361: Holly cow, how do you guys ever enjoy music. I could never be an audiophile. I like listening to music too much!
@AudioMasterclass replies to @alittlelooney5361: Hi Robin, we enjoy music in all kinds of ways.
@lisa_oliv: I hear someone hunting for a wolf
@Tommyoneleg: "audiophile" a person of self importance, Musicphile a person enjoying music.
@Michel-r6m: You're just stirring the shdt up.
@jebbishop3: I think the main aim of this video, which it succeeds at wonderfully, is to demonstrate how annoying and irrelevant audiophiles can be.
@tomlathrop4094: I have appreciatedf high end systems for over 50 years. My definition of an audiophile is someone that is concerned with the quality of the reproduction. I know may people that love music and listen to live music quite frequently that dont concern themselves too much about the quality of the reproduction. Sure they appreciate the quality of my system but dont feel compelled to improve their own systems. I also know many people that have very nice systems but listen to music that sounds good on the system rather than the music they actually enjoy. You can tell this by the difference between what they play at home versus the car. It reminds me of HAM radio operators. They are more concerned about the distance or geographic location of someone they are talking to than the actual conversation.
@baldeagle5297: I couldn't hear it through my PC speakers, but when I used my headphones, I could. It wasn't enough to ruin the music, and I probably would not have noticed it were it not brought to my attention.
@harmyd007: What is that click-like tapping sound behind the instrumentals
@ifwshafin: i heard it, thought it was aight and natural. the part which hurt me even more was the beautiful bite of the instrument being clamped down and the horrible youtube compression
@halrichard1969: At least on my mid-level equipment I thought I heard the Lead Instrument(Clarinet?) getting a bit scratchy on the high notes. Thats all i heard.
@halrichard1969 replies to @halrichard1969: I am a musician who enjoys well executed music.
@nico3562: I heard it and I liked it
@chrisgill1302: I disagree.
I am an audiophile.
Audiophiles test and analyze their hardware to make sure what we are hearing is being faithfully reproduced. We don't listen to a couple of random songs and provide judgement.
We might have a list of songs that we KNOW well and test various aspects of the system we are evaluating. We aren't interested in necessarily WHY it sounds like it does...unless it is something during recording that distracts from the performance...like issues in the recording booth.
For me, I really don't know or care about the source mix. It is what it is. I don't know if any "problems" I perceive were intentional or not (most of the time)
Hell, for all I know the audio dude might have been fresh off some acid and wanted to recreate an auditory orgasm he experienced hours earlier. You dig?
Anyways, it was an interesting topic, I wish you would have pointed out the nature of the perceived issue ahead of time.
Honestly, I heard it immediately and thought it was merely part of the performance. And luckily, I am sitting here measuring some speakers I just repaired, because otherwise I'd have had my narrow soundbar as my primary speaker and I probably wouldn't have heard anything at all, even after you pointed it out.
@Lizardman9808: Idk man imma producer
@agogo8861: dont hear it .. ima blame shitty yt
@prabouo: Consuming this content with my 50 cent goldfinch earbud
@robertfranken7543: I don't mind the movement so it didn't sound wrong.
@battery_wattage replies to @robertfranken7543: I’m no audiophile, but I much preferred that moving around. Sounds more like I’m there.
@everydaybiker: Only got the headphone on
@Tokamak9: I am an audiophile coz I clearly heard the clarinet.
@FMichaelThomas: I heard the difference in stereo but you said to listen to something that's wrong with it and I didn't think that was wrong with it. Plus it was very minor it wasn't sweeping back and forth a huge amount so it makes sense seeing him play and moving about how that would happen. But I did hear it originally I didn't think it was wrong.
@user-nb1dl8de7h: There's clicking sound
@JoeyLegendd: Well I thought the problem was the fuzz... I guess "audiophiles" are different. I wanted the clarinet to have more clarity but the placement seemed done with intent.
@francisco.castillo: Peter File?
@marlls1989: Seems to be clipping on the high frequencies, there were some distortions too
@kunaldahale1908: i heard it and liked it too, didn't find anything wrong about it :)
@pranabkhandual5687: 2:18 I did hear it but I didn't know it was something wrong, I thought it was intentionally made that way
@pawew.8433: I heard that clarinet is mostly litte on left and bottom from center, and didn't notice other positions. First listening I focused on some crackling sounds in bacground, thought this is what we looking for. What is that sound, it became clear when show up that record is from real playing orchestra. Btw, many audiophiles listen high level, extreme metal music, like death metal, or black metal. It's becouse they can separate each instrument hearing what exact particular melody is played, well hearing all details togheter they really can enjoy it. For rest people, is more like fast played chaos. In my opinion good example is track "Nile - Execration Text" , where is easier notacible each instrument for non metal listeners.
@twosawyers: Turn off spacial audio if you have on Apple Apple headphone equipment.
@fatflyin: Jokes on you, i have a hearing loss in my left ear around 50%, fant hear shit. Good vid
@DemonGates: spotify is right winged racist trash now
@dnatech4477: It sounds just like my Tinnitus!
@DouglasBower-n2u: I AM NOT AN AUDIOPHILE. I HAVE TWO SYSTEMS 1 FOR MY HOME RECODRING SYSTEM WITH WIRED STUDIO MONITORS TO DO A JOB GET THE FLATTEST RESPONCE I CAN TO OBTAIN A GOOD MASTER BASES AROUND KRK MONITORS, THE OTHER FOR MY HOME AUDIO I HAVE A LARGEST BOSE ACOUSTIC WAVE CD PLAYER AND SPEAKERS COST £2000 NOT AT ALL ACCURATE BUT I THINK DOES A GREAT JOB AT ACOUSTIC AND CLASSICAL MUSIC. I DO LIKE IT FOR ALL ITS FAILING. SO THE LESSON IVE LEARNT OVER THE YEARS IS LISTEN TO YOUR SYSTEM BEFORE YOU BUY CAN YOU LIVE WITH IT IF SO BUY IT ITS YOUR PREFERENCE NOT ANYONE ELSES.
@foltairguns3814: I'm not really surprised that this has to put out there, I heard this and Imost people don't believe me that I can.
@cixin10x: Not being an audiophile saved me a lots n lots of money.
@superzetmox: Me watching this video in my 1$ earphones
@MultiWirth: I wouldn't call myself an audiofool, but i still care about audio quality a lot more than the average person.
I can hear subtle distortions in the mix, actual issues.
Compression artefacts and frequency cut offs if the encoder is trash or the bitrate low.
I can hear and localize "objects" in a space.
The recording you provided just sounded fine. I could hear air streaming through the clarinet, the room and separate locations for each instrument.
But i couldn't "hear" the musician dancing around.
Maybe i'm just not trained enough, i really don't listen to classical music at all.
I can hear channel inbalance, Dolby B tracking/azimut issues in cassette decks and clearly hear if vocals aren't dead center and instead slightly panned towards one side.
Probably more of a "technical" listener, but this fits my music taste i guess.
@motti222ar: To achieve high-quality sound and good sound separation, you need high-quality speakers, a high-quality receiver, correct settings, and a high-quality recording of the music.
@supremeboy: I knew before this video i have audiophile hearing. I have listened Dutch testing channel when they change cables sometimes they test 4-6 cables per video. I can hear each time the difference, there was always one cable that sounded mudding.
At home tested 3 cables and they all have small difference but its very dependant of music you test with.
@alphagt62: An audiophile is a hobbyist. A person who assembles a stereo in an effort to get the best sound possible. If you buy a nice stereo, and use it for 20 years, you’re not an audiophile, you just have a nice stereo. But if you’ve had 3 or 4 different speakers in your room, if you’ve made an effort to fix the acoustics of the room, if you keep changing your gear, looking for any improvements, then it’s a hobby, and you’re an audiophile. That’s all it means, it doesn’t require super hearing, or belief in magic, it’s just a passion to keep looking for an upgrade, and to experiment with your setup. You never reach the end, it’s the pursuit of excellence.
@nicestrat: all i heard was weird clicking noises in the left channel mic drop
@srdga4230: I did not hear a damn thing because I am using cheap computer speakers. I will take the song from the hi-res version in Tidal to my reference system. I'll bet it will sound fabulous.
@RayPaganJr: I’m not close to being an audio engineer p, but I know what my ears enjoy. I love this video and want to hear more. A few years late here, but I’m subscribing and adding Clarinet as Prima Donna to my library. Thank you.
@nemesisxp3533: the sizziling when the trumpets were high?
@MegaAlterSchwede: Stating that "there is a problem in this recording" is very subjective.
It might be that you would have preferred, if the instrument stayed at the center or slightly to the left, despite the artist moving a lot. But that is not what happend when it was being recorded. And this is also not what the audio engineers seem to have intended, otherwise they could have just attached a microphone to the instrument itself.
A problem, in my opinion, would be e.g. too much noise from the mics, some strange distortion due to not correctly level out the microphones, noise due to vibrations of the microphone or similar.
Stating the movement of the panning of the instrument as a problem is like stating that "the timing on that one note was not right on point, but 2ms to early". It is also nothing you - as the listener - could change anyway. So your equipment doesn't matter at all.
I would have preferred if it was stated like "there is some subtle feature in this recording", then I wouldn't have tried to find artifacts possibly produced or even eliminated by my setup (and no, I am not an audiophile, just standard headphones, simple monitoring satellite speakers and lots of noise from PCs and the environment/street).
Nevertheless, I agree that a lot of "audiophiles" think they are, when they really aren't.
@StevenBloomfield: Listening late at night, off center, I didn't notice movement as much as I thought the levels were occasionally too high. Interesting stuff!
@AxeDatcm: Me with my 1 dollar headset
Hmm yes indeed i can hear it
@AlexandreLollini: Music is arranging sounds in a way that is pleasing to the ears. There is no point in pursuing fidelity. The aim is to produce good sound, minimizing the flaws, maximizing dynamics, power and pleasure. For me filtering is better done by DSPs, and things must be measured, calibrated, and space must be minimally treated to avoid reflections when those are to close to the speaker. When things are in phase, delays set precisely, and there is enough sub and annoying room modes are dodged, things can sound amazing. I prefer XLR, and PA devices, so I am not an audiphile even if I get nice imaging out of my systems. I just enjoy music.
@inmyopinion6836: First was more open ambient and expansive , second was flatter. That , was evident on my system. The floating instrument was only evident after the 3rd listen.
@jcc777: To be able to identify what I heard I need to have a reference. Which means I either needed to have heard that recording before on something that I am familiar with or I need to have been at a live performance..
@ithryn: I didn't realize it was a problem but especially a certain part was definitely biased to the right side of stereo, I noted it and then continued to look for the problem, I'm on cheap bluetooth earbuds and my phone, I don't think I'm really an audiophile, as evidenced perhaps by not knowing that was a problem
@juanpablo-rdm: I'm an Audio Enthusiast of YouTube Music Videos
🙉
@zackk695: I’ve been in it for 45 years! I can tell the difference between high quality and low quality systems. No human can really tell the difference between high quality and super high quality. I would put any audiophile test together and have 5 sound systems. One being a $2000 system, then 3 systems around $4000 and then one that’s $20,000 and no expert would have gets it right with consistency. Not even possible. Most of it’s a bunch of hype. Now there are truths to how speakers and systems should be set up. There’s no doubt it can sound truly bad or great
@swayambhuhingane8763: Was someone typing in background? 🤔
@AudioMasterclass replies to @swayambhuhingane8763: Yes of course https://youtu.be/1upTPepErTY?t=175
@gladteer873: audiophiles are just wannabe musicians
@khrlshkrn: I hear clarinet sound from left n left high more often than right.
@davew4998: I've always been bemused by people who buy the most expensive audio equipment. They end up listening out for recording 'imperfections' rather than the beauty of the music. And what exactly is the 'true' sound they are looking for? If you go to a concert, the sound you hear depends very much on where you sit. I suppose you could say you want to hear it as the composer intended, but who knows what Beethoven had in mind when it comes to say the balance between the double bases and the violins? I once sat behind the double bases at the Royal Albert Hall during Beethovens 5th. It was quite an experience, but nothing like the sudio engineer was trying to capture.
My ex was a musician and we used to listen to music on a cheap radio. We listened to the performance not the burr of the speakers.
@jebbishop3 replies to @davew4998: this comment is spot on. The 'true sound' doesn't exist.
@shapeofsoup: I’m not a professed audiophile. I have some enthusiast instrumental, recording, and mixing experience.
I’m wearing AirPods Pro 3, and I noticed it immediately. But possibly only because I was listening for something. I also didn’t really log it as a problem. I found it enveloping, imagining the frequencies pulsing with life around me as the clarinetist moved about.
@freesaxon6835: Interesting ( no that's not sarcasm)
Just supposing you actually like to hear classic music
' nat -tuo - al ' with the orchestra in front of you.
Is that bad 👹👹 ?
OR
You praise yourself for being able to distinguish between one flute player and another ?
Is that bad 👹👹 ?
OK I know it's not as simple as that but.....
@AudioMasterclass replies to @freesaxon6835: If by "you" in your comment you mean me, don't worry - I have my season ticket for the BBC Proms at the ready, starting Friday https://www.royalalberthall.com/tickets/proms/bbc-proms-2026
@freesaxon6835 replies to @freesaxon6835: @AudioMasterclassI didn't mean YOU, I meant an individual reading the post
@freesaxon6835 replies to @freesaxon6835: A great ticket to have!
We were up so close to a recital in Manchester, and heard a string pop on a violin, and the expression on the violinist face .... all good real raw stuff
@JoMagus: I call me an adiophile but I didn't hear the jumping tones. I heard a clear clarinet sound and good composition BUT I heard some plops in the background. :) But my setup isn't that expensive and made not difference when I hear it with my Logitech Z623 2.1 PC-Speakers or my Sennheiser Game One and my Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty on CachyOS (Linux). I can tell your the difference between a MP3 and a FLAC but here I pass. ;) And yes, I have a very sensitive hearing. But I definitively hear irregularities in some songs.
@rexusdark716: Well thanks for making me figure out my headphones were on mono audio mode 😭
@dicktater9637: An audiophile is someone who doesn’t multitask when listening to music. It’s about being into and moved by the music, and not anything else.
@NoVoice71: See, I listened to this, having never heard this piece before. I actually did hear, and feel the shift between the channels. But to me, I thought there was nothing wrong with it as I, myself, took this piece at face value and assumed that it was MEANT to be heard that way. So, having the proper context for what one hears is also of utmost import.
Now to be fair, my setup is for music, movies and games. I have Infinity Loud Speakers from 1997 along with the matches center channel and 2 15" HSU subs, along with Klipsch rear side and rear rear speakers, all powered by a Dennon receiver.
So while I did hear it, I thought that's the way it was intended
@zettabyte7957: honestly, there is no problem with the recording. it's the finished product right? and it's coming through as it should. cause the audio engineer is to an extent, an artist, and just because you're not a fan as to how the artist put together their art doesn't mean it's wrong. it's like disliking a painting just because they didn't paint the genitals. if it was audio peaking then yeah that'd be an issue, but sterio doing sterio things is not only a not problem but a nice addition
@UiNemu: Is it just me or is there a gas leak-ish sound when he's speaking or when there's audio playing on the video?
@TilDovreFalls: I liked the wandering ound. Went well with the music.
@Flexximilian: Ridiculous to call this a "problem" in the first place. If you shall listen to a woodwind, and call movement of the performer a flaw, you might be an audio equipment or audio recording geek (which is fine), but this has nothing to do with enjoying music. The benchmark here is what a person in the room would here if sat at the sweet spot of the auditorium. One would hear the performer's movement. Of course! So no, I didn't hear anything *wrong" with this recording, since there isn't anything wrong with it.
@Elminator666: I am not an audiophile, but I did notice in the song that the clarinet did peak loudly in my right ear, but not in my left ear. I chocked it up to tinnitus in my left ear.
@fabianjaegerfjg: There is also a click Sound in youre first and second example
@paulofreitas9742: I thought you meant the sound of the clarinet keys moving. Personally, I just saw what you mentioned as a natural and common little detail, not really an issue.
@ryanmaxwelll2730: I'm prepared to believe some people can see ultraviolet and infrared light . . .
@gelioslist: Im simple man - didn’t hear the nuances or difference at all
@Tech-Synthetic: I had vocal boost on XD and everything sounded wrong compared to original piece and overall compressed, this makes a lot more sense when I turned it off and went back to listen properly.
@assStuckey: yeah im a human , not an audio file
@nuescu: the moving of the clarinet did not bother me, but the fact that it was very much "in front of me"did.
@amynagtegaal6941: As an audio engineer, stage technician and producer.
Some of the things audiophiles believe are true but not as of a big difference as they say it is, some other things are complete bs.
@UKA0x7C9: I am really impressed with the stereo sound of my phone speakers.
@MarcusClaudel: I was listening for something wrong as you stated. Therefore I didn't hear anything wrong. For a minute there I thought something was wrong with me lol
@TYT695: I listened multiple times using my trusted Sennheiser 600, I find nothing wrong, guess I am not an audiophile 🤣😂
@Austincj24: why does it sound like there is sweeping in the back round
@ujo4eva: Wouldn't call myself an audiophile, I just learned to run a live sound system volunteering at Church.
The clarinet just seemed to be moving around, is the only way I can describe it
@xhackxslashx: All I can hear (with my misophonia) is the squishy mouth sounds you’re making and it’s horrifying 😂😅
@Menruleall: The piano was invented because of recording engineers, really?
That's the only problem I hear in this video.
@richardbonner6931: to me the brass sounded a bit fuzzy, the solo was lovely.
@Rick-l4w: After you listen to the All NEW TNW Audio V12.1 Orthophase CELL Speakers you just might be calling them your "Holy Grail Speakers too" !
@Sarge92: the only think i can hear wrong or weird about it is a quiet clicking in the background its almost like keyboard keys
and if my setup is somehow supreme enough that i got it right i have amazing news
my iems cost me 39.99 on amazon and im using the default audio output of the steamdeck