Adventures In Audio

Can you tell which mic was used on a recording?

There was a comment on my article Q: Which is the best compressor and equalizer? that got me thinking. Here it is...

Do you really think someone listening on their iPod or their home stereo is thinking 'that sounds like an Avalon to me'?

So I asked myself whether I really think I can hear the difference between, say, an Avalon M5 preamp and a Behringer MIC100. Well I know the answer to that...

Having played with one of the most expensive preamps in existence, and almost the cheapest, on a live vocal at Abbey Road Studio 3 (I took the Behringer in myself), I am quite clear that although I very much enjoy using the Avalon and feel that it inspires me to greater feats of achievement, I am not absolutely confident that I could tell the difference on a blind A/B test, when both preamps are operated well within their limits. Not every time anyway.

When you are operating equipment though it is easy to hear the difference between one preamp and another, or one compressor and another. And that difference will make one piece of equipment, or plug-in, easier to work with and capable of greater achievement than another. But in the mix? Well it's so much harder to tell.

Microphones are a completely different kettle of fish though. Microphones are so much more different to each other than anything else we use, other than loudspeakers, that it is generally possible on a blind A/B test to tell any one model of microphone from any other. Indeed, as microphones age it is possible to hear differences in individual mics quite clearly.

But here's a deeper question...

Could you identify a particular mic, just from hearing a recording? Let's make it easier and ask if you could identify the mic being used if you had worked with the singer many times yourself, and the preamp is neutral and familiar to you?

I would say that identifying the type of mic should be possible for an experienced engineer. By this I mean whether the mic is a dynamic, small-diaphragm capacitor, large-diaphragm capacitor or vacuum tube. Perhaps the most easily identifiable would be the ribbon mic. I would still say that 100% accuracy would be a tough challenge.

I would say therefore that the most easily identifiable equipment - identifiable from a blind listening - is the type of microphone used on the vocal. Here are some other things you might ask yourself if you can identify, type or model, solely from listening...

  • Preamp
  • Compressor
  • Mixing console
  • DAW
  • Bus compressor
  • Summing mixer
  • Reverb hardware or plug-in

Ask yourself these questions and ask yourself hard. If you truly can identify these things by model just by listening to a finished mix, then you are a GENIUS! Don't be shy - tell us about yourself in the comments.

But there is one aspect of a recording that can be identified purely by listening...

I am told on good authority that BBC studio managers (as they call their engineers) soon learn to identify recording venues purely from their acoustics. They can listen to a recording and tell you exactly where it was made.

I can easily identify recordings made in London's Kingsway Hall...

From the sound of the subway trains passing underneath!

The rest, well I'm not so sure.

Your comments on the identification of equipment or software purely from listening will be very welcome.

 

Wednesday March 2, 2011

Like, follow, and comment on this article at Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Instagram or the social network of your choice.

David Mellor

David Mellor

David Mellor is CEO and Course Director of Audio Masterclass. David has designed courses in audio education and training since 1986 and is the publisher and principal writer of Adventures In Audio.

Audiophiles - You're wasting your money!

Audiophiles - You're wasting your money!

Watch on YouTube...

If you can't hear this then you're not an audiophile

If you can't hear this then you're not an audiophile

Watch on YouTube...

CD vs. 24-bit streaming - Sound of the past vs. sound of the future

CD vs. 24-bit streaming - Sound of the past vs. sound of the future

Watch on YouTube...

The Vinyl Revival - So wrong on so many levels

The Vinyl Revival - So wrong on so many levels

Watch on YouTube...

More from Adventures In Audio...

Get VU meters in your system and in your life [Fosi Audio LC30]

Is this the world's most diabolically expensive DAC? [iFi Diablo 2]

A tiny amplifier with a weird switch in a strange place

Will this DAC/headphone-amp dongle work with *your* phone? [Fosi Audio DS2]

When is a tube power amp not a tube power amp? - Aiyima T9 review

I test the Verum 1 Planar Magnetic headphones for listening and production

Your power amp is average - Here's why

Adding tube warmth with the Freqtube FT-1 - Audio demonstration

Adding tubes to a synth track with Freqport Freqtube

The tiny amp that does (nearly) everything

Can I unmix this track?

Why you need a mono amp in your system - Fosi Audio ZA3 review

Can you get great earbud bass with Soundpeats AIR4 Pro?

24 bits or 96 kHz? Which makes most difference?

16-bit vs. 24-bit - Less noise or more detail?

Are these earphones REALLY lossless? Questyle NHB12

Could this be your first oscilloscope? FNIRSI DSO-TC3

OneOdio Monitor 60 Hi-Res wired headphones full review

Watch me rebuild my studio with the FlexiSpot E7 Pro standing desk

Can a tiny box do all this? Testing the Fosi Audio SK01 headphone amp, preamp, EQ

Hi-Fi comfort OVER your ears? TRUEFREE O1 detailed review

Get the tube sound in your system with the Fosi Audio P3

Any studio you like, any listening room you like - For producers and audiophiles

Hidden Hi-Fi - The equipment you never knew you *didn't* need - Fosi Audio N3