Adventures In Audio

Analog tape delay - better than digital echo?

Any enclosed space will create natural reverberation, where sound bounces off surfaces causing a million reflections, and an infinite number of reflections of reflections.

In the open air, a hard flat surface, such as a wall, the side of a building or a cliff-face, will cause a single echo. These phenomena are well-known and understood by both our conscious and unconscious mind.

Since natural echo and reverberation are a common feature of our aural experience, it is inevitable that they will be incorporated into our recording techniques. For some reason, these days we call echo 'delay'. 'Echo' is occasionally, and confusingly, used to mean reverb.

The simplest device that was commonly used in the past to generate delay, was the trusty Revox B77 (and formerly the A77) analog tape recorder. Because this is a three head machine, there is a gap - and therefore a delay - between the record and the playback heads. The set up is thus:

  • Send signal from the channel to which you want to apply delay via a post-fade auxiliary send to the Revox.
  • Switch the Revox to monitor off-tape.
  • Bring back the output of the Revox to another channel.

Like magic, you now have a single echo on the signal which you can vary in level using either the auxiliary send or the fader of the channel to which the Revox is connected. The latter would be preferable since the noise level can be optimized.

The problem with this is that there isn't a great deal of control over the timing of the delay. At a faster tape speed, the delay time will be shorter. The varispeed control will also allow a small variation in timing.

However, before the days of digital delay, people would go to considerable lengths, and it was actually possible to construct an external varispeed control that would allow almost any delay time that could be musically desirable.

At longer delay times, the tape speed would be slower and therefore the quality of the delay signal would be poor, but that was considered to be part of the charm of the technique.

Even now, analog tape delay sounds subjectively better than digital delay. Although there are plug-ins that claim to recreate the sound of various types of analog tape delay, somehow they get the 'substance', but they don't quite get the 'magic'.

Perhaps that's why delay isn't used as commonly now as it once was...

Sunday March 9, 2003

Like, follow, and comment on this article at Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Instagram or the social network of your choice.

David Mellor

David Mellor

David Mellor is CEO and Course Director of Audio Masterclass. David has designed courses in audio education and training since 1986 and is the publisher and principal writer of Adventures In Audio.

Audiophiles - You're wasting your money!

Audiophiles - You're wasting your money!

Watch on YouTube...

If you can't hear this then you're not an audiophile

If you can't hear this then you're not an audiophile

Watch on YouTube...

CD vs. 24-bit streaming - Sound of the past vs. sound of the future

CD vs. 24-bit streaming - Sound of the past vs. sound of the future

Watch on YouTube...

The Vinyl Revival - So wrong on so many levels

The Vinyl Revival - So wrong on so many levels

Watch on YouTube...

More from Adventures In Audio...

Get VU meters in your system and in your life [Fosi Audio LC30]

Is this the world's most diabolically expensive DAC? [iFi Diablo 2]

A tiny amplifier with a weird switch in a strange place

Will this DAC/headphone-amp dongle work with *your* phone? [Fosi Audio DS2]

When is a tube power amp not a tube power amp? - Aiyima T9 review

I test the Verum 1 Planar Magnetic headphones for listening and production

Your power amp is average - Here's why

Adding tube warmth with the Freqtube FT-1 - Audio demonstration

Adding tubes to a synth track with Freqport Freqtube

The tiny amp that does (nearly) everything

Can I unmix this track?

Why you need a mono amp in your system - Fosi Audio ZA3 review

Can you get great earbud bass with Soundpeats AIR4 Pro?

24 bits or 96 kHz? Which makes most difference?

16-bit vs. 24-bit - Less noise or more detail?

Are these earphones REALLY lossless? Questyle NHB12

Could this be your first oscilloscope? FNIRSI DSO-TC3

OneOdio Monitor 60 Hi-Res wired headphones full review

Watch me rebuild my studio with the FlexiSpot E7 Pro standing desk

Can a tiny box do all this? Testing the Fosi Audio SK01 headphone amp, preamp, EQ

Hi-Fi comfort OVER your ears? TRUEFREE O1 detailed review

Get the tube sound in your system with the Fosi Audio P3

Any studio you like, any listening room you like - For producers and audiophiles

Hidden Hi-Fi - The equipment you never knew you *didn't* need - Fosi Audio N3