Let me tell you something - even after seeing, playing with and reviewing almost every serious hard disk editing system that has come onto the market in this country over the last few years, I still get excited about going to see another one...
et me tell you something - even after seeing, playing with and reviewing almost
every serious hard disk editing system that has come onto the market in this
country over the last few years, I still get excited about going to see another
one. Its like visiting frontier country, where the outer limits of the
civilised world meet unknown territory. With hardly any announcement, the way
we handle audio has changed completely as a result of digital and computer technology.
In the old analogue and electro-mechanical days, the equipment was the way it
was because the operator turned a knob which moved a wiper which changed the
resistance of a potentiometer - direct control of the audio in other words.
Now that we can tell a computer what to do to control the audio, the knob doesnt
have to be a knob any more. It can be a knob, or it can be a graphic on a computer
screen, or it could - if you wanted - be the position of the tip of your index
finger in space, the degree of dilation of the pupil of your left eye, or the
quantity of low frequency vibrational energy produced by the rumbling of your
stomach since its half an hour past lunchtime! The point is, we still
dont really know how we want to interact with audio even though we have
a virtually unlimited choice of ways in which to interact. Finding the optimum
solution will take years of product development and experience in the field.
It was pretty exciting stuff when DAR unveiled their touch screen equipped SoundStation
II, or SSL released ScreenSound with a pen and graphics tablet interface. But
the controlling device - apart from these two examples and a very small number
of others it is usually a mouse - is only one aspect out of possibly hundreds
or even thousands of elements that make up a user interface. The appearance
of the graphics, the file handling system, the organisation of the components
of the audio production - all have a vital part to play in making the equipment
easy or difficult to learn and to use, and seemingly subtle differences can
have a major effect on usability and efficiency.
Why try to reinvent the wheel?. Its an old saying but no-one
has come up with anything better than a circular disc with an axle in the centre
(yet!). Another way of putting it could be, Why try to reinvent a large
part of the user interface when major companies have spent massive amounts on
R&D to produce theirs and are prepared to make it available to you for next
to nothing?. Not quite as snappy maybe, but I think it is an important
consideration. Apple and Microsoft are computer orientated companies that have
spent probably millions developing their Finder and Windows interfaces and their
research is now paying off in two ways. The first way is that both are good
usable interfaces that handle the elements that different software applications
have in common. The second is that once you have learnt one piece of software,
another piece of software running on the same operating system will appear very
similar and will be much easier to learn. As the computer becomes more of an
integral part of our daily lives we will find that the functions of the interface
that Finder and Windows eventually evolve into will become second nature to
us, like switching on a light, drawing curtains or driving a car. We dont
need to thing about these things because they have penetrated our consciousness
to such a degree that they are intuitive - and you never find a car with the
clutch pedal on the right!
The Audio Masterclass Newsletter is a free resource to help home recording studio owners improve the standard of their work. The Newsletter is available on this website, and via free email subscription.