Virtually Useless? Hear what VU meters can really do for you in the studio

Browse Pro Tools courses...
Browse Logic Pro courses...
Browse Cubase courses...
Get the most from your studio with the Audio Masterclass Music Production and Sound Engineering Course.
Learn more...
@AudioMasterclass replies to @adielstudiosllc7235: I don’t have plans at present but you might want to listen to my podcasts on gain staging at https://www.soundonsound.com/techniques/gain-staging-episode-1-sos-podcast
@electreelife: It’s written on just about any analog emulation plugin manual. Stop miss leading people
@CarlosPerdomo: I didn’t get the point of the video… 😢
What did I miss?
I use the VU meter to adjust my kick and base, other than that, in the digital world, the VU meters seem to be useless. Am I missing something?
@electreelife replies to @CarlosPerdomo: Your not. and you are doing it right
@bigwhitedog1991: brilliant thanks - the best on the web - have you done a vid on 32 bit float? that would be really good
@AudioMasterclass replies to @bigwhitedog1991: I’m sure I will cover 32-bit float at some point. It doesn’t improve audio quality but has some excellent convenience features.
@popcycles: in an analog mixer, it does.
@Miamicop100: Wow you have got to be a neuroscientist to understand clipping...I know you said some important stuff, cause you had a clue of what you were saying, and you tried explaining a concept. I downloaded the free mwmeter2 to test it out, and couldnt even get it to show up in my DAW. And this entire topic is just a haze to me. I want to understand, but it is too complicated. As all I want to do is plug and play my instruments.
@AudioMasterclass replies to @Miamicop100: There are some simple rules that will get you a long way.. 1: No red lights when you’re recording. 2: No red lights when you’re bouncing your mix. 3: Make music.
@trackquestmusic: Thank you for the lesson...
@paulhunter6652: Hello: Will these VU meters work on my Bryston headphone amp and streamer? Low wattage and voltage. They have balanced connections. I’m not familiar with all the technical jargon. Thanks.
@alanm.thornton4055: OOOOOOOO. REDBULL F1 DRIVER SLAM!!! NICE!!!
@AudioMasterclass replies to @alanm.thornton4055: 5:39 for comment readers
@guuuuustaf: I guess I am dumb, and a bit drunk. But for a noobie like me. is it OK to override into the Red area in the VU meter ? I am using a fosi mcm101 amplifier with a focal 100 lc6st in ceiling speaker. When the bass kicks in it goes way into to red, when the volume I prefer is set. I should not have bought a vu amp. this is getting my anxeity going. I dont want to break things. Anyone who knows more than me is much welcome to answer me this. ( yes english is my second language boomshakalak)
@akikyriazis6136: This was very helpful!
@herbphelps8713: LOL
@malcolmmitchell8538: But they look great!
Don’t care what they do😂
@AudioMasterclass replies to @malcolmmitchell8538: I can’t deny the look is good.
@flamindigo: it (digital 0 dbFs) was -12 db = 0 in 2008 when I was in college for audio engineering.
@AudioMasterclass replies to @flamindigo: -18 dBFS now. Must be shrinkflation.
@MrSlipstreem: Cassette deck standards moved up from 160nWb/m to 250nWb/m at some point in time (I can't remember exactly when), and that's why 'older' cassette deck meters have their Dolby reference level +3dB and 'newer' ones have it at around -1dB. The obvious consequence of NOT doing this is that a Dolby encoding made on an early machine wouldn't get the correct de-emphasis on playback on a newer machine (or vice versa) if both used their respective 0dB level for Dolby calibration.
Of course, Nakamichi deliberately disagreed with everyone else (just as they had originally with recording and playback EQ curves) and went for 200nWb/m as the 0dB point AND Dolby calibration point just to make sure they were as incompatible with everyone else as possible. Play an original MkI Dragon recording back on any relatively modern deck and it will sound quite woolly, especially if it was recorded in Dolby B and you're trying to play it back in Dolby B as that magnifies the error.
@AudioMasterclass replies to @MrSlipstreem: In pro audio using Dolby Type A (or SR) the tape recorder must be calibrated for unity gain so what comes out is the same level as what went in. The level can be adjusted on playback but this requires that there be Dolby tone on the tape before or after the program material. Cassette with Dolby B is the same regarding level. So, as you say, there will be an error.
@ChrisLinesComposer: Great video. Someone who actually goes in depth and puts VU meters in context. Thanks.
@kuolettavakissa: 2:35 Why does too much level in a radio broadcast get the station shut down?
@Gma7788: It should be variable ultage.
@richardstirling5799: Great vid thanks - learned a lot
@Mattysworld1: Top notch content thank you
@AudioMasterclass replies to @Mattysworld1: You're welcome.
@Robil63: "Real world" I can buy, - "Bricks and mortar VU meter"? Now you've gone too far.
@flying-pinky: Actualy it should be -20 db because proffesional equipement should give you +20 db output with full digital signa.
@Middlestepofficial: First and last: I don't gain stage. Neither Andrew Scheps does.
@marcusdekker: Beautifull made video! Congrats and thank you!
@TheGreatConstantini: Nice video. In the day I spent many hours aligning tape decks and we certainly used VU meters as well as using them in our recordings and mixes. Today I will glance at my daws digital meters but really with the headroom in digital recording and relatively negligible noise floor I really on my ears. So a really good exercise that I recommend is to push several different signals like you had on you example up to where you can hear nasty digital distortion as well as see if when turned way down you can hear any noise. As your projects get more complex with many tracks do the same. Gain staging is still important and VU as well as other metering is visually helpful but nothing beats your ears……providing you can still hear!
@biggles5633: The AI character is goddamn awful. ... please .... otherwise really like the content
@NilankaGrrr: What mic are you using for the videos? 👀
@AudioMasterclass replies to @NilankaGrrr: Usually Sennheiser MKH 416. Sometimes AKG C414 EB but if I use that you'll see it in shot.
@tudorgheorghe4532: Did you know that Bit rate on audio testing tone has a impact on stability of the test? What BIt rate did uou use and what bpm ?
@marcusbrsp: Visually Ubercool
@artysanmobile: VU meters are really good for alignment. They sit still really well and very small changes can be made easily.
@schkhermer5249: is it possible to achieve 0VU and also -14lufs same time?
@tudorgheorghe4532: I get it ! You are kind composer of some sort.Volumes and international regulations were written bbc and others.they stands for av laws?!!! Or not a joke.reaf snd learn,internet
@noizfactory: Love your content and the humour that goes along with it! Especially liked the F1 reference in this one 🙂
@g.e.miller4335: Why do these things all flash tiny tiny lights. If something important is happening, why doesn't the entire meter turn red and stay red and the music stop and the computer tell you what's exactly wrong and how to fix it? And why do you get a "light" flash anyway. Why isn't the indicator a loud beep or a siren? Why isn't there an absolute measurement? Water freezes at an absolute measurement of temperature. Paper burns at an absolute measure of temperature. Why is all this stuff so unclear? Really, all this technical knowledge gets in the way of artistry. If, when a painter is painting a painting, they had to use a meter to tell them if the red paint is too bright, or the canvas is too rough, or the black isn't 100% black, it would slow you down and make it an agony to paint a picture. Why isn't their a DAW that is set up so that everything you can hear, is fine. If suddenly you can't hear anything, then there's a problem. So, as long as you can hear anything, your music is going to be fine. AI exists now. Why can't AI just make the music sound perfect without someone having to look at meters and adjust sliders? You're aware of the concept of "being in the flow" or "being in the groove", well technical stuff takes an artist out of the state of flow, it snaps you out of the groove. It makes you stop and think. All these technical things you have to consider to just make a song, get in the way of making the song. They are rules, and if you don't follow the rules, you're going to be in trouble, so you better keep your mind on the the needle and your hands on the mouse.
@dataplatter: I get that the AI thing was a joke, but yuck
@TDDmusique: This was charming, wonderful and educational. Thanks!
@tonylewis1803: Great vid! Others simply add, over time and from experience, what sounds good in their daw of choice. The VU is simply a, as you suggested, a slower signal device. Instead of fiddling with lowering or raising the calibration, I simply just add , or subtract to what I see on VU based on what sounds good and take note of the levels for future reference.
I use the simple bar graph on the channel as references as you suggest because it is faster. The parameters I “see” are based on experience from using my daw of choice, and a daw, (which is assumed to be known, but wasn’t mentioned ?) as we know, has much more headroom then analog. Also, I don’t know about the other meters you suggest, but I use the TB pro audio which also has a peak meter. Going back and forth between the VU and peak in one meter is super handy, and, as you said, it’s free!
@nattaphoomtewarun9978: VU still classic and important for the mixed. but I used for playback and visualization to digital music playback. I love look and feel
@markus918: Hello. I installed the VU Meter on the track and I have a terrible overload, although there is no overload on the master track. Is there even a limiter installed? Could you explain what my problem is?
@AudioMasterclass replies to @markus918: I recommend that you visit a web forum that is dedicated to the DAW that you use. That is where you will get your best answer.
@markus918 replies to @markus918: @@AudioMasterclass Ok! Thank you!👌
@giacomogagliano8639: This guy is brilliant! Love him!
@AudioMasterclass replies to @giacomogagliano8639: So do I.
@janetscollay5598: you have 3 different meters displayed on the screen at 4min 12 secs into your video. why is the 3dB point in different places above or below centre scale on these meters?
@AudioMasterclass replies to @janetscollay5598: I'm not understanding this. If the scale matches the input level everything's OK.
@TheYougig: PPM's please!
@1976oswald: too much talking bro. sorry
@AudioMasterclass replies to @1976oswald: Filled up your brain too soon did I? Not sorry.
@stevejagger8602: Why was the analogue PPM not adopted, as it was throughout the UK Broadcast TV industry.
It provides an absolute reference for recording and transmission.
@AudioMasterclass replies to @stevejagger8602: One of the eternal mysteries of audio.
@georgelewis3047: The spanner. The spanner!
If you are unfamiliar with that term, you can find an example in the boot. The boot!
@AudioMasterclass replies to @georgelewis3047: One should always keep a spanner in one's boot.
@tuckerbingo2491: Misleading headline
@AudioMasterclass replies to @tuckerbingo2491: You're probably so clever that you can explain why for the benefit of my comment readers whose time you are otherwise wasting.
@tuckerbingo2491 replies to @tuckerbingo2491: @@AudioMasterclass speaking of wasting time
@chakravarthiamithraghav8008: The spoken style of your assistant, intonation and tone kind of disturbing and makes understanding a challenge. But your reading is very comprehensible.
@patriot7734: I have the pleasure of owning a Live VU meter! No matter what rooms she is in she can tell it's too loud..she screams out an analog sound "turn that shit down", so this saves me a ton of money just on my power bill, and the risk of blowing up my speakers...I am blessed..
@WardoUSA replies to @patriot7734: Best comment of 2024
@the-best-ever. replies to @patriot7734: Underrated comment...
😂😂😂
@DalesBadBug: I Use One VU Meter on my Master channel.
Set all channels to "0.db"
No Plugins on any channel.
Mute all but one channel at a time.
slowly use the gain (not volume fader) and play the Instrument/vocal etc that's solo'd, until the meter needle hits "0.0" or close to it and stays that way.
Do ^ this for every channel until finished. then go into Mixing (adding Compression, eq, reverb, delay, whathaveyou. Do NOTHING on the main master bus (yet)
Once you've Mixed to your liking, then you can adjust fader volume to tracks that are clipping (or again, to your liking/satisfaction)
*I Like to set my faders to where none of the tracks Go passed the green.
Then, Move on to Finalizing
*if it's for an Instrumental : Do "Buss compression/EQ,Loudness,Limiting etc.etc.etc" whatever you can do to keep your track sounding good even at the loudest volumes on All Equipment (Monitors, Headphones, consumer speakers, car)
@IamHovaFlo replies to @DalesBadBug: @dalesbadbug can u explain what u mean on the last part where u stated if it’s for an instrumental
@RyanHarris77: -18 dbvu is the prevailing preference of mix engineers simply because it’s a very safe amount of headroom, or at least the sense of headroom because it’s usefulness depends on the transients in the material. Ok, I’ll shut up and keep watching.
@Hopkins132: I didnt understand shit
@cezarcj9357: Sir, you present things in a very unique and professional way. Big like for your efforts even though you seem to do things effortlesly. Big like!
@dodgingrain3695: Eh.... just use short term LUFS for gain staging and determining perceived loudness. Skip the stone age VU meter.
@maxheadrom3088: The question that remains (i hope still when the video is over) is: what V.U. means? Thanks!
@AudioMasterclass replies to @maxheadrom3088: Volume Units. I'll be making another video on this topic in due course.
@AbiliTV: SPOT ON!
@dylanhughes4548: Poor Checo - really wish he could get a bit closer to Max just so we could have a bit of competition. Tempted to get myself one of those lovely outboard Crookwood VUs now.
@micksmith106: I like VU meters for one reason only , they look cool, and I'm of that age 😂
@AudioMasterclass replies to @micksmith106: I have another VU video coming up soon. Watch out for it.
@juanswitalski5427: I recall calibrating the Studer A827 as high as 375 nW/m with Agfa tape back in the 80's. Crazy, right? The Verstappen vs Checo example was unecessary. Hahaha! 😁
@AudioMasterclass replies to @juanswitalski5427: Agfa 468. It spooled very neatly.
@andrii4545: But.. IT"S PRETTY 😄😍
@Doonie602: So I got the Klanghelm meter after watching this video (I always use mvmeter2). I put all the settings the same on both and the Klanghelm is off by 0.2db. Whats the deal?
@keithmoriyama5421: When I started out in the 70's-- there were only Vu meters. Then when LED's came in they were all the range and definitely better for some applications. For a studio application, LED's were better for tracking individual instruments but, Vu meters were more indicative of tape. Along with the advent of LED meters, Vu's began to incorporate peak indicators invalidating this video-- there was no such thing as full scale hard clip. For the record, you DO NOT record equally onto tape. Some programs/ instruments benefit from over saturation-- 1st, 3d and 5th harmonic distortion. If you have a musical background I don't have to explain the benefit of that. Finally consoles began to incorporate both LED meters and Vu's on the mix buss and/or mains-- especially useful for live applications. IMO this is the best form of metering. Mains and individual channels are not the same and require different visual representation.
@miquelmarti6537: LUFS are roughtly based on those old VUmeters. Before having digital audio with humongous headroom, they were absolutely manadatory. Nowadays you just need them in the A/D stage, as 64bit DAWs have plenty of headroom..... althought it's always a good practice just to ensure you are not overclipping your plugins (wich is teoricaly not impossible).
@artysanmobile: My career began firmly in the days of the VU meter. VUs were read musically and were often accompanied by a single-level peak indicator. Between that setup and just hearing the playback, we all came to know the dynamic performance of instruments we recorded. Would it have been easier with a peak reading meter?
Of course it would!, and I soon learned to love the PPM standard meters that were so foreign to American engineers. Most Neve and SSL consoles had at least a couple of them if not all. It just took new interpretations to know how hot to track instruments with very high crest factors. This also revealed the source of the ‘magic’ tape yielded on every instrument. It turned out we were using tape’s complex frequency dependent compression to get our drum sounds.
It also turned out once making the change to digital recording in the 80s that we no longer knew how to get that sound which came almost automatically to us not so long before. In my opinion, this is the source of most of the discontent over digital recording at the time, and understandably so. I always tracked toms and cymbals together, noting that it sounded way better than separately. We all know now why that was and it is hellishly difficult to reproduce that sound. Tape compresses and limits in a very complicated way, fiendishly difficult to emulate.
The VU, in its own quirky way, was what told us when we were ‘there.’
@laurentitolledo1838: VU meters are useless.... to useless individuals...
@AudioMasterclass replies to @laurentitolledo1838: Haha, I love it when people think they're funny.
@giorgib: Don’t dis the VU. Those of us who are steeped deep in analog, never went into a studio without it. The digital world needs to catch up. Slow or not use it!
@TheGurner1: Nice expo! I use it a lot set to RMS as it's very close to LUFS for mastering - altogether a great Klanghelm plugin - don't think most people would need the Deluxe version though
@chriscorry7290: Very pleased to hear that the 0dBU = -18dBfs is not clearly defined on the internet, as I got tied up in all this a few months ago, and unsure which system I should be using. However, having sorted that, I now find I'm no nearer understanding all this stuff! I watched the middle part of the video several times, inc half-speed, partially because the examples precede the numbers. That the meter under-reads the perceived volume is not new to me. But what I don't get is that as the signal drops the number displayed becomes a smaller negative value, not larger - eg I was expecting a drop of 6dB to show as a value of -24dBfs...?
@Doonie602 replies to @chriscorry7290: Exactly the same here. It was literally impossible to find that simple answer and this dude in the video laid out plainly.
@dalemosdeliverers9050: European Broadcasting Union..."The EBU recommends
that, in digital audio equipment, its Members should use coding levels for digital audio signals which
correspond to an alignment level which is 18 dB2 below the maximum possible coding level of the digital
system, irrespective of the total number of bits available."... ~EBU Technical Recommendation R68-2000 Alignment level in digital audio production equipment and in digital audio recorders
@dalemosdeliverers9050 replies to @dalemosdeliverers9050: Oops... thought the video was new... my bad.
@Mitsch76: Fantastic video, giving a good understanding of what a VU is and what it can do. Well done! I studied audio engineering in the 90ies so tape recording was almost over, I started out using PT HD on a large console. Using a lot of analogue gear like preamps, compressors, eq, multi FXs, Delays....but I never recorded analogue. Nevertheless I had to read VU meters all the time on that gear. And who don't like a jumping needle with a cool light on it???
With digital processing I turned to RME and used the K metering system a long time, and still use it happily. The readout of e.g. K-12 is very useful for me.
BUT I will put the old PC to the trash, in a few days...(*crying tears*) and leave for my SSL setup. 🙂 That means I go for a VU meter again.
BTW It's a good use to compress with a VU meter showing the gain reduction, too ;-)
@dougg1075: You can have my VU meters after you pry them from my dead hands , and replace them with a spectrum analyzer. Green please
@bobshifimods7302: Anything that is unnecessary in the audio chain can potentially damage the sound. Tone controls are a complete no no in the analogue area. In the old days amplifiers were festooned with lights and they sounded terrible. It is possible to have VU meters on amps configured in such a way that sound is unaffected, but better to spend the money on a bigger transformer and/or better components.
@TharinduHimash: 😘😍❤
@wilsonlaidlaw: The VU meters on my Philips N4522 reel to reel (semi-pro) read noticeably higher on replay than they did on recording the same music on the tape. This does not seem to matter much on my usual new tape of RTM LPR35 which is very tolerant of over driving but I also have a lot of Ampex 406/7 tape which is much less tolerant. The machine has just been serviced with attendant elimination of various faults and improved sound quality, by TS Professional Audio in Burgess Hill, West Sussex.
@victormarshall832 replies to @wilsonlaidlaw: You can correct this by inputting a 1khz tone at 0db Peak and recording, then monitor the tape and using the two presets labelled Rec Current located on the rear panel, adjust until source & tape read the same. Useful if you use the same tape stock all the time. I use SM468/911 on my N4520/22's.
@gonnfishy2987: VU had their place in the analog world of audio! /ex radio presenter/audio engineer
@OrangeMicMusic: I can't wait to hear your opinion on gain staging since you said that inside the DAW you should not go over 0dBFS'. It's necessary or not on today's workflow inside a DAW?
Why I'm asking, because this subject continues to spark debates.
From plugin developers, where some of them are stating in their user manuals that the signal entering the plugin should be -18dBFS (0 VU), to music producers who are stating that they don't care about what's going in, it matters not to go out above 0dBFS on individual tracks or buses.
@BishopEddie5443: VU meters are a useful gauge in getting pleasing levels without clipping or unwanted distortion.
@spacemissing: The best way to learn the metering on a specific analog machine
is by recording at various different levels and listening to the results.
@AudioMasterclass replies to @spacemissing: This is true. Analogue recording is always a balance between signal-to-noise ratio and distortion. This will vary according to engineers' tastes, and of course what it is that's being recorded. DM
@COLDMKULTRA: But somehow ... We managed to produce things like "Crime of The Century" at Trident et al, using such dreadfully inefficient and antiquated technology !
Moral of the story ... you can make almost ANYTHING work ... if you learn how to use it correctly 👍👍👍
@ianl.9271: Why would a VU meter be useful on a DAW? I'm fine with the RMS/peak meters.
@kurt120032002: actually my story is quite short: I want a a cool looking box with 2 needles to move around when the music plays. I got front headphones and pre enabled and tha that means I don't even need an output at that box, it doesn't have to do anything else except look cool on my amp. I do not rout the sound out of it, it does not need to be precise, or anything else. 😂
@1974UTuber: A mixing desk I learned on had a VU hold function so it would hold it peak so you hot a better idea of where your levels were at.
Cant remember the brand of the desk though
@laika25: Betty is very knowledgeable AND efficient
@enewhuis: I feel like modifying my few (real) VU meters with a circuit witha reset button that shows me the max gain reached to see if I've oversaturated something I didn't quite hear, so I can crank the gain up further to make sure everything is saturated. :D j/k that A.I. animation is creapy and I never want to see it again. Forgive me I am a drummer...and don't use Google. Use Freespoke.
@EricRosenfield: That AI women is real creepy
@Invisbke: I used to use them in the old days of analog. And their pretty cool….fun to ride them on the edge…..
@cholkymilkmirage4984: paul mcartneys brother teaching mixing.
@TuffKaya: 1:21 All the horror
@N8oRMusic: Wouldn't a VU metre just be used on the master output as opposed the individual tracks?
@lerssilarsson6414: Dad had one in his Corolla -69 50 years ago. Wondering why not a RPM meter?
@RudeRecording: Zero dBm was originally 1mw across 600 ohms or .775v which was defined by Bell Telephone. A typical VU meter was calibrated for zero at Line Level which was equal to +4 dBm or 1.23v across 600 ohms. VU [Volume Units] meter was calibrated for optimum display of RMS levels with the ballistics of the meter defined and calibrated for broadcast use. I still like to use VU meters across my stereo buss to gage my mix density. I'm old school, guilty as charged.
BTW: Ampex 456 standard bias reference level was 250 nW/m [nano Webbers per meter] with "Elevated" bias being 370 nW/m typically used for 30 IPS operation for Ampex 456. The higher fidelity of 30 IPS operation was better high frequency response and lower noise at the loss of a half octave of low frequency response. The 370 nW/m standard was pretty common in studios by the late 80's. 250 nW/m was used for 15 IPS in broadcast. 185 nW/m was the Ampex "original" standard for older tape formulations and 7.5 IPS. I really don't miss tape, I was the guy that had to maintain the tape machines in both broadcast and multitrack studios. And no, I don't think tape sounds better, it's a sound quality that we're used to.
Early in my broadcast engineering career I was called into the Air studio by a DJ due to a "clicking sound" in his headphones when he had the microphone on-air. I quickly determined that he was running the mic so hot the RCA console VU meters were banging hard against the end stop making a loud click. Not so good for analog meters and in fact I noticed that the pointers were bent from repeated abuse. While the station processing prevented overmodulation of the transmitter, I found that the DJ actually liked the sound of the mic preamps being over driven. "Sounds more intense." he remarked. In those days a limiter for the mic channel would have been expensive and it would have involved a major rewiring of the console. No insert patch points on broadcast consoles. It was a Album Oriented Rock station.
I've been a professional broadcast and studio engineering since the mid '70's. I currently run a live capture audio/video service and mixing/mastering/editing services.
@RocknRollkat: Hello.
This -18 dB 'standard' is ridiculous. I build my own analog V.U. meter plugins and I subscribe to 0 V.U. being exactly that.
As you well know, there is no 'soft clipping' in the digital domain. Therefore my overload LED comes on at 0 dBs.
Period.
If I see that LED blink, I crashed.
Why record at -18 dBs and give up 3 bits of data and settle for 78 dBs of dynamic range ?
No need to remind me that I'm a reactionary hardass who still records like it's 1961.
I could go on for days about how these kids think that the -18 dB thing is for the benefit of 'soft clipping' plugins, etc.
All I know is that if we went 'into the red' in the old days, there were 'consequences'....
Once again, a most enjoyable presentation, thank you !
Bill P.
@AudioMasterclass replies to @RocknRollkat: I absolutely agree but with the one exception that -18 dBFS, when quoted, is usually meant to be a 'round about' level to aim for, not peak. But it does seem that it's widely regarded as peak which, as you say, wastes 3 bits. Coming from analogue myself, waste is just plain wrong. Shame we can't donate those unused bits in some way. DM
@RocknRollkat replies to @RocknRollkat: @@AudioMasterclass All of those unused bits are following me into old age, I'm afraid !
B.P..
@felipousismix: It's my understanding that -18 dBFS = 0 VU (EBU) and -20 dBFS = 0 VU (SMPTE), for Post.
Wikipedia>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DBFS
@AudioMasterclass replies to @felipousismix: -20 isn't the problem. I have documentation on that. I'm still looking for the definitive source of -18. It must be somewhere but finding an authentic document that links -18 dBFS with 0 VU has so far been difficult. DM
@majikglustik9704: So, volume units are to audiologists as scale rules are to draftsmen? Have I followed well?
@ArjanvanVught: Funny the Max comparison ;-) yes, I am Dutch
@robertusga: I think this guy is really Paul McCartney
@ashwadhwani: The VU became popular to enjoy 80's discobeat music ;)
@1donniekak: Depending on gear quality channel eq changes with volume.
@societyofhighendaudio: HI. Greeting from farEAST
@AudioMasterclass replies to @societyofhighendaudio: Hi back, thank you for your visit. DM
@GTChris: I always wanted to learn about VU meters from Sir Paul McCartney, thank you for making my dream come true.
@editingsecrets replies to @GTChris: In Penny Lane the studio meters show VU
of every signal that the tape will ever know
compatibility can come and go
at 4 dBU
@LonetrackTV: I love your investigative, objective attitude toward the subject. A lot of audio people on YouTube get lost in the "mojo" stuff.
@editingsecrets replies to @LonetrackTV: Least nostalgic vintage gear discussions on Youtube!
Everyone else: It's so old fashioned, crunchy and warm! Just like Mum and Dad's living room!
Audio Masterclass: Toss out that old inaccurate junk, you nincompoops of all ages!