On the right is a loudspeaker, on the left is a gong. What?
I was privileged last night to attend a performance of Turangalîla by Olivier Messiaen, first performed in 1949 to highly critical reviews, but now considered a show stopper in the world of orchestral music.
I won't bother you with too many details, which you can find here, here and here, because I want to get on to the fun stuff that I teased in the title of this article. But it's worth saying that the work features a large orchestra, plus a piano, plus a celeste, plus a keyboard glockenspiel, plus...
...an ondes Martenot, named for its inventor Maurice Martenot. It looks like this...
Yes, it's a keyboard instrument. Some might say it is a early synthesizer, but its sound source is a simple oscillator that doesn't begin to cover the vast range of sounds that are now possible through synthesis.
But that simple oscillator... Well think of the simple strings of an electric guitar. They don't make much of a sound when played unplugged. But connect the guitar to a pedalboard, amplifier and speaker cabinet, then we have a whole universe of sound from Les Paul to Dave Gilmour to Buckethead and more.
So in the ondes Martenot (French for Martenot waves) the oscillator is amplified and connected to loudspeakers, but these are not normal loudspeakers - they are purposely designed to alter the sound, which is not the way we think of loudspeakers (other than in electric guitar cabinets) today when we strive more and more for accuracy.
When, where, how?
Going back to Turangalila, the performance I attended was one of the BBC Proms, which is a festival of promenade concerts in the Royal Albert Hall in London, held annually. The orchestra was the BBC Symphony Orchestra, conductor Sakari Oramo, with pianist Angela Hewitt and ondes Martenot performer Cynthia Millar.
The performance was as brilliant and exciting as I expected it to be. You can sample one of the most popular parts of Turangalila in an old but powerful-sounding performance here. The ondes Martenot player, either by some strange coincidence or because there aren't many of them around, is again Cynthia Millar.
After the BBC Proms performance during the applause, the thought came to mind that I might rush to the front as soon as I could and take a few photos, which as you can see I did just that - unfortunately with my old and rusty iPhone 5, but they're good enough to show some interesting details.
After I had taken a few shots and the audience had mostly dispersed, I noticed a small crowd gathering around me, which justified my reasoning for getting to the front first. And then...
Cynthia Millar came on stage, presumably to dismantle her instrument. We gave her a small but warm round of applause. And then the questions started coming. Everyone wanted to know more about the ondes Martenot, and Cynthia was fantastic in giving us answers in detail and explaining the different loudspeakers. Of course as someone interested in all aspects of sound production I knew most of this already. But that was only from book-learning. To hear it from a performer brings the whole thing so much more alive. And so to the loudspeakers (you can learn more about the keyboard itself here)...
Palme
The loudspeaker on the right in my main image is called the Palme, which I am informed is because of its shape like the leaf of a palm tree. Sound is produced by the motor part of a normal moving coil loudspeaker drive unit, but instead of connecting to a diaphragm, it excites the bridge of the instrument and thence the strings. Additional resonance is provided by the hollow body, like that of an acoustic guitar.
In case you're wondering, yes the strings are tuned. And there are more strings round the back.
The sound of the palme is quiet and delicate, and totally unlike any other instrument. Here's an example, just ten or twelve seconds before the topic changes, but it should give a good indication.
Métallique
Take a look at this...
From the front this looks like a normal loudspeaker cabinet. But then Cynthia turned it round. As you can see, there is no conventional loudspeaker diaphragm inside. Instead the moving coil motor is attached to a small gong. The idea is again not to reproduce the signal from the oscillator precisely, but add rich harmonics that create a much more interesting sound.
Résonance
I don't have such a good picture of the third loudspeaker, but in any case there doesn't seem much to see...
But no, it's not just an ordinary loudspeaker, inside a moving coil motor drives springs into vibration, thus creating yet another harmonic texture that is available to the player. I imagine that if I got the chance to look inside, I would see something quite like a spring reverb unit, but made so that it transfers vibrations in the spring into the air with reasonably high efficiency.
My thoughts...
Why don't we have more loudspeakers like these?
It seems to me that these ideas dating back to the 1920s have not been given the attention and further development they deserve. There are more ways to create sound through electro-acoustic means than the conventional moving coil drive unit, designed to transform an electronic signal as accurately as possible into real sound in air.
Yes we have stomp boxes that alter a signal electronically; plug-ins that alter a signal digitally. But what about loudspeakers that alter a sound electro-acoustically. (And what about loudspeaker modifiers that alter a sound after it has been produced by a loudspeaker, and purely acoustically? - Actually we cover that in one of our Audio Masterclass courses, with some fascinating results from our inventive students.)
I suspect there may be great adventures ahead. But in the meantime, here's more of Cynthia Millar and her ondes Martenot. Enjoy...
P.S. (Moan and groan department) Whenever the ondes Martenot or Theremin are heard or mentioned, someone is bound to say that they sound science-fictiony (yes, someone did last night). In fact, it isn't that these instruments sound like science fiction, it is that what we expect science fiction music to be like sounds like these instruments. The ondes Martenot and Theremin are capable of a huge range of expression and can fully take their part in music of all genres.
Comments on this video
You can comment on this video at YouTube
You can comment on this video at YouTube
@BrunoCosta-dp7ms: Maybe Cynthia Millar had a collaboration with the legendary film composer Elmer Bernstein and he learned her to play Ondes Martenot.
@LucasDavalos: Beautiful instrument, beautifuly explained.
@knowingwhatthebuttondoes3432: The name 'Ondes Martenot' sounds like an made up social media bot account name.
@MCDreng replies to @knowingwhatthebuttondoes3432: It means Martenot waves, it's French.
@travisdykes4537: Jonny Greenwood of Radiohead brought me here. He uses an Ondes Martenot on quite a few songs to amazing results. Especially when playing a melody through the left channel while Ed doubles up with an Ebow on the right channel.
@bryangl1: I'm not sure if it's made clear, but this isn't the original Ondes Martenot, very few of those fragile instruments still exist. I think this more modern adaptation of the instrument can not only duplicate the sounds of the original, but can produce a greater range of sounds, and in total, is more versatile. And appears to need even great skill from the performer.
@kazimierzijadwiga replies to @bryangl1: No, that is the oryginal Ondes Martenot, 7mk. This instrument has wooden touche d'intensite because oryginal is broken and replace by new one but this only the only difference. Those are 3 diffuseurs without Palme because Martenot replaced palme with resonance spring speaker. In earlier versions you can find 4 speakers but this one on the video is probably made short time before of the end of production.
@g1fcg: I happened to be watching 'Counterweight' an episode of The Outer Limits on Talking Pictures and googled 'who played the Theremin on this episode' - As a Theremin player myself - I assumed it was a Theremin.
I was amazed to learn it in fact was a 'ondes Martenot'! I'd never heard of this before!
Again, like the Theremin, invented in the 20s using a heterodyne principle - fascinating!! I bet they are costly with all three different speakers etc. Also a bit like the 'Tannerin' as used on 'Good Vibrations' by the Beachboys.
@KikeGarcia66: Amazing
@yoshimallo: Why a pedal you need to have your left hand always on instead of a foot pedal?? I can see why it never took off now
@bcj842 replies to @yoshimallo: The inventor was a radio operator, so I reckon he was thinking of a Morse Key for the left hand.
@briankehew579 replies to @yoshimallo: It only plays one nite, so you need one hand. The left hand is critical as it moves very fast on and off of the note, and also has much more gentle expressivity than a foot pedal would do.
@daniarorynbayev8530: that ring and string and single wooden key are so cool together.
Radiohead brought me here
@bartni: this a random radiohead comment
@glade_maker: Very nice and instructive video but sound is very low and with little noises... Actually we can hear the Ondes very well!
@gardnerlittleton9711: Came from Koji Yamamura's "A Country Doctor"! Saw this in the bts for the music and vocals and WOW never heard of it before, very cool instrument.
@richardthayer5907: musicians clearly love to EXPLAIN this instrument.
@user-iv7pl2uo7q: Maurice Jarre used an onde as the foundation in the the soundtrack to Lawrence of Arabia. Have not heard a better, more exotic, more haunting application of the instrument.
@mondellomusic: The notes are precisely repeatable with a keyboard, seems like a real improvement over the theremin in that regard.
@DamienDrake replies to @mondellomusic: @mondellomusic Check out the segment from 10:30 to 12:10 in this video with Carolina Eyck. It's entirely possible, and repeatable, on the theremin too.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LYSGTkNtazo&t=78s&pp=ygUjQ2Fyb2xpbmEgRXljayBwbGF5IHdpdGhvdXQgdG91Y2hpbmc%3D
@rendezvouzwithrama: I'd love to hear Debussy, like Claire de lune, on this.
@peterlandbo2726: No matter how it’s played, it sounds genuinely frightening
@jaytonuk: Absolutely fascinating. A lovely insight into a rare instrument that I'd not heard of until today. I want to know so much more now. Does it have it's own notation to ensure that the composer's wishes are met by the musician? Thank you to both Seattle Symphony and Cynthia Millar for this great little video.
@antifatbastard: Pretty sure Jupiter 2 ( LOST IN SPACE) engines are from this too
@stevanwarburton5501: LOVE this instrument so much
@BluePlanetMedia: Here's a tip: USE A MICROPHONE! Can't hear the person speaking at all
@snoproblem: The degree of creativity that led to the invention of this instrument and its unique speakers is mind - boggling... and decades before the Moog innovations. Nothing short of genius.
@briankehew579 replies to @snoproblem: Check out a new book called Electronic Perspectives - it has an amazing selection of early electronic instruments. Somewhere much more rare than this one, but both the Martenot and the Moog are included.
@handsome_man69: this is terrible music
@DEATHFATIGUE replies to @handsome_man69: you're terrible music >:D
@-xirx-: Never thought I'd see an analogue synthesiser
@pulykamell replies to @-xirx-: Digital synthesizers didn’t really start hitting it big until the ‘80s with the Yamaha DX7. Most before that were analogue.
@markchapman6576: The lady played on the Ghostbusters films including the latest
@RNmedicSeniorservice: "Get her!"
@LordSkella replies to @RNmedicSeniorservice: “There is no Dana, ONLY ZUUL!”
@RNmedicSeniorservice: 'Listen..... do you smell something?'
@jacvic0790: Here from kid a, iykyk...
@santiagoramirez6820: ¿Quién mas busco este video después de escuchar "how to dissappear completely" en vivo?
@BTsMusicChannel: thank you for this video!!!! i knew that the ones martinot was a theremin-like electro-acoustical instrument, but i did know the playing techniques like she shows in the video. i am glad that i understand them better now. plus i liked hearing the sounds that the techniques (electronic and physical) created. :D
@moviebuffshatto7375: Ah I Love to Hear The Classic Ghostbusters Score. Yeah she did those Spooky Parts of It
@giftheck replies to @moviebuffshatto7375: And she did it again for the new film too!
@elroberto1244: quien viene de parte del profe de musica?
@joaopedroauriemo: SCP-2912 brought me here
@rickyleeufc: Awful instrument
@nandocordeiro5853 replies to @rickyleeufc: Wrong
@Ottmar555 replies to @rickyleeufc: awful comment
@DamienDrake replies to @rickyleeufc: There are no awful instruments, just awful musicians (and YouTube commentators).
@sycorax4941: Fantastic demo! Thank you so much!
@bingola45: Just when you thought the Theremin was crackerjack...
@BTsMusicChannel replies to @bingola45: why would you think that any sound source was "crackerjack"? all sounds are available to the musician for expressive purposes. it is the musician's job to choose them and figure out how to use them expressively, and the listeners job to try to imagine what the sounds -- in their context (musical, social, political, etc.) -- might be expressing. when the listener has achieved this level of capability (i.e., somewhere beyond the dilettante-snob level in which the goal is judging "good" or "bad" by some accepted standard), we might say that they are listening empathetically.
@DamienDrake replies to @bingola45: The Ondes Martenot is far more interesting to my ear than the Theremin, but keep trying to outdo everyone else's cynicism.
@AbdulazizShabakouh: Hello, I see some indications on the score of Messiaen to change the sound to a cello-like sound, could you please show us how to use the other sounds of the instruments? and what should we write on the score to produce any certain sound or effect?
Thank you so very much for this quick lesson!
@Carol120454: I've read that the British composer Barry Gray used this instrument in the music for the TV show UFO. It made that whirring sound of the UFO's as well as the space music. The forerunner of the Moog and other synthesizers.
@sturdeehouse replies to @Carol120454: I heard that he went and recorded real UFO's, but this sounds much more plausible
@spooked7952 replies to @Carol120454: Used as the 'sleeping astronauts' theme of the film 'Journey To The Far Side Of Te Sun', besides in the UFO series.
@stevanwarburton5501 replies to @Carol120454: Yes he did, he brought in France's top player / pianist of this instrument, Jeanne Loriod to play "Sleeping Astronauts" for his suite from the movie Journey to the far side of the sun (1969)
@walterevans2118 replies to @Carol120454: @@spooked7952 In the episode CLOSE UP
@connerfields4753: Lecture begins at 2:21
@connerfields4753 replies to @connerfields4753: Nostril scratch at 2:20
@nandocordeiro5853 replies to @connerfields4753: @@connerfields4753 lmao
@ZeacorZeppelin: I met her twice at performances of the opera The "Exterminating Angel", she was the nicest person I met at The Metropolitan Opera. I even have a letter from her. I hope to someday see her again
@Z7y631: why do you have to use your left hand to press the brown button thing to produce sound, isn't better to use your feet instead like a foot pedal, so you can play with both hands? I'm sorry if this may potentially be a silly question, there must be a good reason i am just not aware of it at the moment.
@CharlieDraper replies to @Z7y631: ben Z later Ondes Martenot models, like the Mk 7, included two foot pedals to control volume and immediately mute the output of the instrument. Maurice Martenot was a cellist so to him, controlling amplitude with one hand and pitch with the other probably made more sense than using pedals. For more complex passages however, pedals are definitely helpful!
@eugenezandberg8057 replies to @Z7y631: ben Z, this is a monophonic instrument, so there no use for using both hands to produce the pitch. And i think it's easier to control the volume with a finger then a foot, it gives you a more finer control. Though this last thing just depends on the player i guess. Some will be more comfortable by doing this with a pedal. Some modern adaptations i saw are using a breathcontroller for the volume instead.
@jebmcgovern3744 replies to @Z7y631: Because on pivots their index finger off of their middle finger. It makes for lovely dynamics. Much better than a foot if. More delicate
@AbdulazizShabakouh replies to @Z7y631: Because it is a monophonic instrument.
@DavidJamesonPhD replies to @Z7y631: @@eugenezandberg8057 Really? What happens if you need to play one note after another very fast and the two notes are very far away from each other?
------
so there no use for using both hands to produce the pitch
@nodfactor8808: Beautiful!!
@JW-cm2er: One person is afraid of the dark.
@jacvic0790 replies to @JW-cm2er: ?
@MyBeautifulDarkTwistedFantasy6 replies to @JW-cm2er: @@jacvic0790 if time is my vessel then learning to love might be my way back to sea…
@jacvic0790 replies to @JW-cm2er: This lyrics or something?
@charlesrepetti8850: Thx!
@MrmelodyUs: Nice demo!
@JoshSemans: Thank you for producing and sharing this!