Adventures In Audio

Microphone polar patterns - how to choose the right pattern for the job

Rule number one of polar pattern selection: Choose cardioid!

Well, that was easy, wasn't it? Of the four main polar patterns you can choose from - omnidirectional, cardioid, hypercardioid and figure-of-eight, cardioid is generally the best pattern for most jobs.

There are good reasons for this. An omnidirectional microphone picks up sound from all around the room. This means that it will pick up other instruments, and even if there are no other instruments it will pick up a lot of reverberation.

The consequence of these unwanted sounds creeping in is that you will have to place the microphone closer to the sound source. And unless you want the unnatural sound of excessively close miking, this is not going to produce best results.

At the other end of the scale is the figure-of-eight microphone. If you point this at the sound source, then you must also consider that it picks up sound just as readily from the rear. So it's a mic that you can't help but point at and away from the sound source simultaneously. If there is sound coming from the rear that you don't want, it will be picked up in all its glory.

So cardioid is a good in-between choice. It is reasonably directional and rejects sound from angles other than its main axis. No-one ever got fired for choosing cardioid. (Hypercardioid combines features of the cardioid and figure-of-eight to produce a pattern that is more tightly focused than the cardioid, but at the expense of some unwanted rear sensitivity.)

But there is another way to look at things. It is easy to design an omnidirectional mic. Just have the diaphragm open to the air on one side and seal the back. It is easy to design a figure-of-eight mic. Just have both sides of the diaphragm completely open to the air.

But to design a cardioid or hypercardioid means applying an 'acoustic labyrinth' to the rear of the diaphragm so that it is not completely open but the sound arriving at the rear undergoes changes in amplitude and phase so that when combined with the signal arriving at the front produces the desired pattern.

Cardioid and hypercardioid microphones are therefore more complex than omni and figure-of-eight, and their sound quality suffers because of this.

So for the most accurate recording, you would choose an omnidirectional or figure-of-eight microphone.

Bear in mind that all mics other than omnis suffer from the proximity effect where the bass rises for sources close to the diaphragm.

In practice though, modern cardioid and hypercardioid microphones are very good, and the selection of polar pattern boils down to these simple rules...

  • Choose an omni if you want the most natural sound and don't mind about sound being picked up from all around.
     
  • Choose any directional mic if you want to reject sounds from certain directions, or if you want a bass boost for a nearby source, such as a vocalist. A cardioid will be a good all-round choice.
     
  • Choose a hypercardioid mic if you want a tighter focus than a cardioid.
     
  • Choose a figure-of-eight if you want to reject sound sources coming from the sides, or if you want to use a two mics as a classic coincident crossed pair for stereo.
Thursday November 10, 2005

Like, follow, and comment on this article at Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Instagram or the social network of your choice.

David Mellor

David Mellor

David Mellor is CEO and Course Director of Audio Masterclass. David has designed courses in audio education and training since 1986 and is the publisher and principal writer of Adventures In Audio.

Learn Pro Tools with our amazing range of video courses

Pro Tools video course catalog

Browse Pro Tools courses...

Learn Logic Pro with our amazing range of video courses

Logic Pro video course catalog

Browse Logic Pro courses...

Learn Cubase with our amazing range of video courses

Cubase video course catalog

Browse Cubase courses...

More from Adventures In Audio...

Hi-Fi comfort OVER your ears? TRUEFREE O1 detailed review

Get the tube sound in your system with the Fosi Audio P3

Any studio you like, any listening room you like - For producers and audiophiles

Hidden Hi-Fi - The equipment you never knew you *didn't* need - Fosi Audio N3

Adding tubes to a jazz mix with Freqport Freqtube

Adding tubes to a rock master with Freqport Freqtube

Adding tubes to female vocals with Freqport Freqtube

Adding tubes to male vocals with Freqport Freqtube

Adding tubes to real drums with Freqport Freqtube

Adding tubes to a bass guitar with Freqport Freqtube

Adding tubes to speech with Freqport Freqtube

Adding tubes to an acoustic guitar with Freqport Freqtube

Parabolic reflector microphone - Sound On Sound latest issue

Your power amp is average - Here's why

MANCAVE REVIEW: In-ear monitors - Better than earbuds?

Can this tiny amp really produce 600 watts? - Fosi Audio V3

MANCAVE - Recreating Olivia Rodrigo's 'Vampire' vocal

Why does this song sound so bad?

Audiophiles - You're all wrong!

MANCAVE RE-REVIEW: OpenRock Pro earbuds in language Audiophiles can understand

MANCAVE REVIEW: OpenRock Open-Ear Air Conduction Sport Earbuds

Can lossy digital audio be better than lossless?

Man-Cave: Microphone mysteries revealed

How I improved my audio - From the Mancave