How the ear hears frequency
Today I'm going to give you an insight into how the human ear hears frequency, and tell you a secret about the magic frequency of 632 Hz (actually 632.45553).
In my recent post about linear phase and minimum phase filters, I used a frequency sweep from 100 Hz to 1600 Hz and talked about the centre frequency 400 Hz. So in what sense is 400 Hz the centre frequency between 100 and 1600? It certainly isn't the average.
Let's start by listening to the sweep...
That was exciting wasn't it? It's the kind of thing that pleases me. I invite your comments.
So let's listen to 100 Hz. You'll need to be listening on proper speakers or headphones. Laptop speakers or eBay earbuds probably won't do much for you.
And now 1600 Hz.
So how can we find the centre frequency between 100 and 1600? Let's take an average.
100 + 1600 = 1700
Divide by 2 gives 850 Hz. Here it is...
Let me play 100, 850, 1600 in sequence so you can judge whether its bang in the middle.
Hmm, I don't really hear it. To me, 850 seems a lot closer to 1600 than it does to 100 subjectively, but it's the same 750 Hz away from both. So this tells us something about the way the human ear works. We hear frequency logarithmically rather than arithmetically. You can learn more about logarithmic scales here...
So how do we find the centre frequency logarithmically? Well I'm sure mathematical geniuses could suggest plenty of ways, but I'm going to use what's called the geometric mean. To get this I don't add 100 and 1600, I multiply them.
So 100 x 1600 = 160,000
Then I don't divide by two, I take the square root.
The square root of 160,000 = 400
So 400 Hz is the centre frequency using this method. Let's listen to 100, 400, 1600 in sequence.
I'm convinced. It sounds halfway to me. If it doesn't to you, let me know in the comments what you think. As I said, it's subjective.
You might, by the way, have noticed that the jumps are two octaves. That's just a coincidence and you can try out this test for yourself with different pairs of frequencies.
So this brings me to the magic frequency of 632 Hz, actually 632.45553. What does it mean? Well, it's the centre frequency of human hearing. Take a moment to absorb that. So how do I work this out? Simple, it's that geometric mean again.
The frequency range of human hearing is normally stated as 20 Hz to 20 kHz. So if I multiply these...
20 x 20,000 = 400,000
Take the square root - 632.45553
Now, I don't expect you to believe me without a demonstration. I can't do it the same way as before since it's unlikely your speakers or headphones go as low as 20 Hz, so you won't be able to hear it. Likewise, although when you're young you can probably hear 20 kHz, with age that limit decreases. So again, probably you can't hear it. So what I'm going to do instead is to sweep the tone upwards and downwards from the centre of 632 Hz. Rather than try to explain, let's just listen.
Now, bearing in mind that your speakers or headphones are probably a limiting factor in the low frequencies, does 632 sound central to you? Let's try it another way...
And maybe try it in stereo...
Well, it's subjective, and you could ask whether it matters. I think it matters because the more you understand about audio, and in particular how the human ear reacts to sound, the better the engineer and producer you're going to be.
I'm David Mellor, Course Director of Audio Masterclass. Thank you for reading.
Comments on this video
You can comment on this video at YouTube
You can comment on this video at YouTube
@AudioMasterclass replies to @KatrinaDancer: I appreciate your perspective on this. However only an audiologist would be able to give you a reliable response so this time I'll stay silent. DM
@garrettglass8854: Would you know if a cancelling frequency could be found to counter tinnitus? How does noise cancelling work? Would there be a way to find and cancel the intrusive frequencies for people suffering tinnitus? Its ok if you don’t know, just thought this is the place to ask.
@AudioMasterclass replies to @garrettglass8854: This is a question that only a qualified audiologist would be able to answer. Sorry but I'd just be guessing. DM
@the_newvoice: When you were yooung)) (The Killers) I hardly hear 16K. That 850 was much disturbing frequency to me!
@pqpguilhermepqp: Many thanks for your rich content, this is really good for training your ears to know which frequencies to adjust when setting band equalizers.
@AudioMasterclass replies to @pqpguilhermepqp: You're very welcome!
@veronicagorosito187: Hi David! This is so interesting, I think it has to do with the Fletcher-Munson curves and how sensitive is the membrane at that range. Not so sure but common sense tells me it has to do!
I'm just starting sound engineering this year and this is our actual study material (the inner ear and all it's parts). I'll send this video to my teachers, stay safe there, always like your mails and videos 🤗
@AudioMasterclass replies to @veronicagorosito187: Thank you for your comment. Fletcher-Munson probably does have an effect with the lower frequencies seeming less loud. It would take an audiologist to comment further. Hopefully your course will be able to shed more light on this for you. DM
@alanosama4212: What's the name this plugin
@AudioMasterclass replies to @alanosama4212: The spectrograph is a feature of Izotope RX7.
@EgoShredder: Would be interested to hear your thoughts in a video about the 432Hz debate vs 440Hz that we ended up with for music after WW2. I 've done a few blind tests and was very surprised to find I selected 432Hz for every single audio example, and even when 440Hz was used twice in one A<>B example, I immediately identified this. I assumed my ears would prefer 440Hz due to being conditioned with it all my life. 432Hz does not sound technically better, but it does feel a lot better, a sense of well being for want of a better phrase.
@AudioMasterclass replies to @EgoShredder: I don't presently have a thought on 432 vs. 440 but I might consider seeing if I can develop one. Related perhaps is that though I don't have perfect pitch when I sit down to mess around at the piano I wonder why different keys (in the sense of tonality) have different characters; some are my favourites, some not so much? And why when F# seems fairly characterless to me, but if I think of playing mostly the black notes I end up feeling that I'm in Gb which is to me extremely mellow? Perhaps I'm just imagining it all. DM
@EgoShredder replies to @EgoShredder: @@AudioMasterclass You're not imagining it at all, and certain frequencies do indeed invoke different emotional responses. If you analyse different genres or pieces of music, you will begin to notice the choice of frequencies match up with the intentions of the music and the people involved. Very interesting psychological and spiritual aspects.