Adventures In Audio

Beyond the Faulkner phased array - the 'Mellor Quad'

One of the problems in recording an orchestra is that the main stereo pair of microphones must be placed closer than the natural listening distance because of their over-sensitivity to reverberation in the auditorium compared to the human ear/brain system. This favors the front rows of instruments at the expense of the rear, and the result is an unnatural overall sound. This is usually cured by introducing additional microphones, but this inevitably also introduces more 'fog' into the sound and less clarity.

So if a stereo technique could be developed that would allow the main stereo pair of microphones to have a narrower angle of coverage, then they could be placed further away, closer to the natural listening position, for a natural perspective.

One solution to this has been employed by the respected British recording engineer Tony Faulkner, in the form of the 'Faulkner phased array', as it is commonly known.

In this, two figure-of-eight microphones are placed parallel to each other spaced apart by 200 mm.

The figure-of-eight microphone indeed has the tightest directional pattern of any of microphone type (other than interference tube or parabolic reflector mics, where sound quality suffers significantly). The drawback is that there is an equal pickup to the rear, but if the acoustics of the auditorium are good then this should not be a problem.

I have tried the Faulkner phased array myself, and although I don't seem to get results quite as good as the originator, they are certainly interesting and the technique is worth having in one's repertoire of mic techniques.

However, I would ideally like to place the mics even further back, which would require a yet tighter directivity pattern.

To do this I have borrowed a technique from radio astronomy. A radio telescope is simply a large satellite dish, picking up radio signals from the universe rather than satellite TV. Bigger is better as the telescope can be more tightly focused and resolve finer detail in the sky.

However, for the ultimate precision in radio astronomy, data from two telescopes can be synchronized, effectively making a telescope of size equal to the distance between the two individual telescopes.

You can do this with microphones too...

Here, I recommend two figure-of-eight microphones perchannel all facing in parallel towards the orchestra. The inner microphonesshould be spaced apart by 200 mm as in the Faulkner phased array. The pairs ofmicrophones for each channel can be spaced as widely as you need to attain greaterdirectivity. Up to around 300 mm seems practical. Both microphones for the leftchannel are mixed together at equal levels. Same for the right channel.

At this point more data is needed to prove the value of this system. If you have the opportunity to try it out, please let me know how you get on.

Perhaps this system will come to be known as the 'Mellor Quad'?

Thursday November 30, 2006

Like, follow, and comment on this article at Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, Instagram or the social network of your choice.

David Mellor

David Mellor

David Mellor is CEO and Course Director of Audio Masterclass. David has designed courses in audio education and training since 1986 and is the publisher and principal writer of Adventures In Audio.

Audiophiles - You're wasting your money!

Audiophiles - You're wasting your money!

Watch on YouTube...

If you can't hear this then you're not an audiophile

If you can't hear this then you're not an audiophile

Watch on YouTube...

CD vs. 24-bit streaming - Sound of the past vs. sound of the future

CD vs. 24-bit streaming - Sound of the past vs. sound of the future

Watch on YouTube...

The Vinyl Revival - So wrong on so many levels

The Vinyl Revival - So wrong on so many levels

Watch on YouTube...

More from Adventures In Audio...

Get VU meters in your system and in your life [Fosi Audio LC30]

Is this the world's most diabolically expensive DAC? [iFi Diablo 2]

A tiny amplifier with a weird switch in a strange place

Will this DAC/headphone-amp dongle work with *your* phone? [Fosi Audio DS2]

When is a tube power amp not a tube power amp? - Aiyima T9 review

I test the Verum 1 Planar Magnetic headphones for listening and production

Your power amp is average - Here's why

Adding tube warmth with the Freqtube FT-1 - Audio demonstration

Adding tubes to a synth track with Freqport Freqtube

The tiny amp that does (nearly) everything

Can I unmix this track?

Why you need a mono amp in your system - Fosi Audio ZA3 review

Can you get great earbud bass with Soundpeats AIR4 Pro?

24 bits or 96 kHz? Which makes most difference?

16-bit vs. 24-bit - Less noise or more detail?

Are these earphones REALLY lossless? Questyle NHB12

Could this be your first oscilloscope? FNIRSI DSO-TC3

OneOdio Monitor 60 Hi-Res wired headphones full review

Watch me rebuild my studio with the FlexiSpot E7 Pro standing desk

Can a tiny box do all this? Testing the Fosi Audio SK01 headphone amp, preamp, EQ

Hi-Fi comfort OVER your ears? TRUEFREE O1 detailed review

Get the tube sound in your system with the Fosi Audio P3

Any studio you like, any listening room you like - For producers and audiophiles

Hidden Hi-Fi - The equipment you never knew you *didn't* need - Fosi Audio N3