The professional way to make sure your mics are connected correctly
Fixing a problem note with Auto-Tune
The 10 rules of pan
Recordings of speech by newly-starting Audio Masterclass students
Q: Why do I have to record acoustic guitar twice?
This voice over studio looks like something out of Monty Python
What exactly does the phrase 'leave headroom for mastering' mean?
Can an electric guitar virtual instrument ever sound like a real electric guitar?
What should you fix before you mix?
New vs. old guitar strings: Part 2 - The case for used guitar strings
Subscribe to access our latest, up-to-the-minute articles with hints, tips and adventures in audio in the weekly Audio Masterclass Newsletter.
There is no doubt that it is difficult to succeed in music. Commonly people fail to succeed because they don’t realize just how difficult it is, so they don’t try hard enough.
But suppose you were gifted with natural talent, and worked your bollocks, or metaphorical bollocks, off. Surely success would be guaranteed?
Well, I came across a startling demonstration of how difficult it is to succeed just last weekend at the annual Thame duck race.
Yes, that’s the annual duck race, at Thame (the 'h’ is silent) close to where I live.
And yes, it is relevant. Very relevant indeed.
What happens is that a local charitable organization has bought several hundred identical plastic ducks, of the kind you might have in your bath.
Each duck is numbered and the public is encouraged to 'buy’ a duck to take part in the race.
On race day, the ducks are put in a grab loader and dumped into the river simultaneously. The winner is the one that floats to the finishing line first. There is even a podium for the first three that finish (ducks, not owners).
Now, the relevance...
All of the ducks are exactly the same so each has an equal chance of winning. Yet what happened in the race was that a few ducks immediately took the lead. Then during the course of the race the front runners got further and further ahead of the pack.
At the end of the race there was a gap of nearly a minute between the first and second place, then another minute from second to third.
The pack was practically nowhere, and many had been caught up on the banks or by low-hanging tree branches.
Now, I would have expected a classical gaussian distribution, where most of the ducks finish in round about an average time, a few are spectacularly fast and some are spectacularly slow.
But those fast ducks... well, they could have taught Lewis Hamilton a lesson or two. They were blindingly fast in comparison to the rest.
What this says for us is that if everyone who aspired to success in music had equal ability and equal opportunity, a few would achieve fantastic success just by chance, and the rest of us would remain way behind, despite our equal ability and opportunity.
Now, suppose that you are brilliant, and you do work your socks off...
But chance has positioned you among the masses, and no matter how much you hone your talent, and how hard you work, you still can’t get anywhere close to the front runners, whose talent and work rate is only average. Chance has selected them as 'lucky ducks’ and you as merely an 'average duck’.
So, you might have thought that, being brilliant and hard working, all you had to do was compete against people who are average. And you would be bound to succeed.
But no, you have to compete with people who are average and have massive luck on their side.
So it’s not just hard to be successful in music, you need at least a certain amount of luck to push you along.
Now here’s a question, and it has to be asked...
Which of today’s successful artists are nothing more than 'front-running ducks’?Come on the FREE COURSE TOUR