What is production? Part 1: A&R
What exactly does the phrase 'leave headroom for mastering' mean?
How much should you charge for your audio services?
Visualizing stereo information using Lissajous figures
Even the best sound engineers in the world can't be trusted - apparently
Why choosing a key for your song is one of the most important aspects of preparation for production and recording
How to get started quickly in home recording
Setting the recording level control in GarageBand
How much difference does mastering really make? [with audio]
The professional way to make sure your mics are connected correctly
Subscribe to access our latest, up-to-the-minute articles with hints, tips and adventures in audio in the weekly Audio Masterclass Newsletter.
Abstract of a paper presented at The Art of Record Production Conference 2005 at the University of Westminster...
Most semiotically-influenced methodologies of pop music analysis favor the recording as the central 'text' for analysis or close-reading. Moore's concept of 'affordance' and Tagg's 'hermeneutic-semiological method', for example, espouse successfully the benefits of close-reading the sound-content of a recording, and of exhausting the range of meanings the listener can create from it. However, this approach rests upon certain assumptions about the listening experience which obtain increasingly infrequently in today's mass-mediated, ubiquitous musical landscape. In particular, the analyst has a privileged position as listener: s/he has ample time in which to cognize repeatedly a favorite recording through headphones at home, without distractions, and with full control over volume. This sort of analysis, though, is unlikely to bear any similarity to that of a partially deaf listener forced to endure snatches of the same recording in a supermarket, say, nor to that of someone for whom the song connotes irredeemable sadness.
Indeed, recent empirical studies on the unpredictable mundanely (sic - 'mundanity'?) of everyday musical listening, by de Nora and Crafts, among others, celebrate the personalized nature of musical meaning, dependent upon factors of personal demography, local situation, temporary emotional state, and so on. Because of these variables, there is a need for music analysis to borrow from ethnomusicology, and to focus upon the individual listener's use of music, rather than on the seemingly objective musical recording itself, as the main object of analysis in a world of bipods, misheard lyrics and barely noticed background music. My 'cultural-acoustic' model for the analysis of music as actually cognized, rather than as cognizable, outlines one such possible ontology combining psychology and acoustics, close-reading and cultural theory. Three example analyses will be examined in order to test the model, and to suggest possible 'real-world' ramifications of such research to the music and advertising industries.
University of Westminster